• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

SteveIndy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2007
421
178
77
Zionsville, Indiana
✟292,173.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

The "testator" is the one who writes the will. We have two last will and "testaments" in our Bible. The first last will and testament is the O.T. and of course the second is the N.T. As long as the testator, i.e. the one who writes the will, is alive he has the liberty to amend, rewrite, or throw out what was written first and Christ did exactly that. He re-wrote the "will" and then He died sealing that will forever. For that reason, anyone who stands before the Judge and pleads any argument using the first "will" will not have a leg to stand on because the document is invalid, it is now only used as an illustration to give understanding to the last will.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,404
11,943
Georgia
✟1,100,995.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married

A charge he flatly denies in Matthew 5
17 “Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. 18 For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. 19 Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. 20 For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven.

Thus it is "still a sin to take God's name in vain" even for Christians.
And thus "SIN IS transgression of the LAW" 1 John 3:4 even in the NT.
Thus that same OT LAW that includes the TEN Commandments - still today "condemns all the world" as sinners - Romans 3:19-20
Thus today our faith "Establishes the LAW" rather than making it void Romans 3:31


Classic "two gospel" POV.

Paul says - there has always been only ONE Gospel Gal 1:6-9
AND that this ONE Gospel "was preached to Abraham" Gal 3:8
 
Upvote 0

Steve Petersen

Senior Veteran
May 11, 2005
16,077
3,392
✟170,432.00
Faith
Deist
Politics
US-Libertarian
15 Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant. (Hebrews 9:15)​

The death in view here is, of course, the death of the mediator himself, the death of the Messiah. This passage can be a bit confusing because a covenant is different than a last will and testament. If we were reading the Greek, things would make more sense because the word diatheke, translated ‘covenant,’ can also mean a person’s ‘last will and testament.’ The Greek version of the Hebrew Scriptures, the Septuagint (LXX), consistently uses the word diatheke to translate the Hebrew word for covenant (brit). But the larger Greco-Roman society in the first century used the word diatheke to mean the last will and testament by which a person left instructions assigning the inheritance of his possessions. Paul used the same wordplay and a similar illustration in Galatians 3.

In Jewish society the rabbis had strict rules regarding the laws of inheritance. These laws are the subject of an entire tractate of the Talmud (Bava Batra.) In the Mishnaic Hebrew of the Talmud the rabbis referred to a person’s last will and testament as a deyateke, obviously a loan word from Greek, meaning exactly the same thing. The Talmud says: “Which type of document is called a deyateke? Any in which it is written, “This shall be valid and enduring upon my death.” (b. Bava Batra 135b)

16 For where a will (diatheke) is involved, the death of the one who made it must be established. 17 For a will takes effect only at death, since it is not in force as long as the one who made it is alive. 18 Therefore not even the first covenant was inaugurated without blood. (Hebrews 9:16–18)​

A covenant is not the same as a last will and testament. The blood of the first covenant was the blood of sacrifices, not the blood of the one who made the covenant, not Israel, not Moses, not the Almighty. Just as a man’s last will and testament does not go into effect until his death, so too, a covenant does not go into effect until a sacrifice has been made. The point is that simple.
 
Upvote 0

BobRyan

Junior Member
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Nov 21, 2008
53,404
11,943
Georgia
✟1,100,995.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Moses and Elijah stand with Christ in glory in Matthew 17 -- before the cross. Before the death of Christ.

"the Gospel was preached to Abraham" Gal 3:8.

They stand with Christ as "sons of the promise" -- so while the New Covenant Gospel of Jeremiah 31:31-33 is not ratified until the cross - yet its promise is claimed and reality gained even in the OT as we see in the case of Moses, Enoch and Elijah taken to heaven before the cross.
 
Upvote 0