Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
White House releases Biden's and Harris' tax returns, "continuing an almost uninterrupted tradition"
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iluvatar5150" data-source="post: 75960574" data-attributes="member: 313046"><p>First: Your post #9 said "<em>the Russia Dossier</em>", not "collusion." The "Russia Dossier" typically refers to the Steele dossier, source of the infamous pee pee tape allegation. So there's one error on your part.</p><p></p><p>Second: The Pulitzer doesn't say that the award was for reporting on "collusion." So there's your second error. You can read the description of the award as well as links to all of the articles that garnered the awards here:</p><p><a href="https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staffs-new-york-times-and-washington-post" target="_blank">{{(global.pageOgTitle) ? global.pageOgTitle : global.pageTitle}}</a></p><p></p><p></p><p>I haven't gone back and read the articles, but none of those headlines are jumping out at me as false. As somebody made clear in another thread when calling you out for using the NYT to support your argument there, it's clear you don't actually believe that NYT is untrustworthy - or if you do, you conveniently put that concern aside whenever it's convenient for you. Because why should source reliability be a concern when there are jabs to be made? I guess that explains why somebody would cite The Daily Caller.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iluvatar5150, post: 75960574, member: 313046"] First: Your post #9 said "[I]the Russia Dossier[/I]", not "collusion." The "Russia Dossier" typically refers to the Steele dossier, source of the infamous pee pee tape allegation. So there's one error on your part. Second: The Pulitzer doesn't say that the award was for reporting on "collusion." So there's your second error. You can read the description of the award as well as links to all of the articles that garnered the awards here: [URL="https://www.pulitzer.org/winners/staffs-new-york-times-and-washington-post"]{{(global.pageOgTitle) ? global.pageOgTitle : global.pageTitle}}[/URL] I haven't gone back and read the articles, but none of those headlines are jumping out at me as false. As somebody made clear in another thread when calling you out for using the NYT to support your argument there, it's clear you don't actually believe that NYT is untrustworthy - or if you do, you conveniently put that concern aside whenever it's convenient for you. Because why should source reliability be a concern when there are jabs to be made? I guess that explains why somebody would cite The Daily Caller. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
White House releases Biden's and Harris' tax returns, "continuing an almost uninterrupted tradition"
Top
Bottom