The Lady Kate said:
You are not God. His rules do not apply to you.
Jesus specifically warned against calling another "fool." Have you read Matthew lately?
Yes.
The Lady Kate said:
IF?
So you say now, but your words suggest otherwise... I repeat my advice to brush up on Jesus' words in the Gospel of Matthew.
My words only suggest the opposite position you stand for.
The Lady Kate said:
Other people are weak minded, you, supposedly, are not. How would you interpret that?
I interpret it like this...
I truely believe that Genesis is literal. I trust God is powerful enough to do what it says in Genesis literally if He wanted too. I believe that science points to a young Earth.
Since you don't, I see you as a confused and decieved person. Just like how you see me.
So why would I think of you as stronger minded as me? Just like you don't see me as stronger minded than you. We hold the same view points.
The Lady Kate said:
This is your opinion, that you are better than others. And you are too proud to change or even to admit the implications. Nobody is trying to "break" you, merely point out the direction your pride is leading you in.
I used to be a TE. I was very bias against YECism. I studied both sides.
I saw a young Earth develop when all the evidence was put together. So pride couldn't of lead me to become a YECist, it was a greater understanding. Just like you say...your trying to point me in the right direction...I'm doing the same for you.
The Lady Kate said:
Fair enough. But how many miracles must God perform to make your theory correct?
Your trying to make me answer a question that has pre-determined my side as incorrect?
The Lady Kate said:
It is one thing to say that another is mistaken.... quite another to call them weak minded for their opinion.
Surely you must know this, and yet you persist.
I'm entitled to my opinion. Just like you.
The Lady Kate said:
That one little issue is an insult to your brothers and sisters in Christ, which you stand by.
Like I said...I never meant it as an insult. I even said sorry. What are you trying to prove? I'm allowed to correct my brothers in Christ if I believe they aren't placing their trust and faith in God properly. ON any topic, not just evolution. I remember once where Paul tells Peter off publicly for seperating himself from Gentiles. Not to be mean, or to be insulting, but to give him a wake up call.
The Lady Kate said:
Precisely. By why stop there? Knowing that God need not interfere in large, ham-handed ways in our personal lives in order to show Himself, why demand that He do so in matters of Creation?
Because we didn't exist yet. There was nothing to compromise. Also, no reason to prolong the inevitable. Note how quickly God made Adam. There was no reason for a slow and pointless drawn out process of infantacy or childhood. God just said the words and it was.
The Lady Kate said:
Except that this is not what those theories say. If you want to argue the science, argue the real science, and not the strawmen.
Ditto.
The Lady Kate said:
Because it does.
The Lady Kate said:
Thanks for agreeing.
The Lady Kate said:
Only 50? Out of hundreds of thousands? I can find you as many historians who say the Holocaust never happened.
That still doesn't prove me wrong. Just that there is a chance, but the same goes for you....so I really don't see your point.
The Lady Kate said:
What evidence? Remember, I'm looking at the same evidence as you, and it shows me that He did not.
The evidence = the Earth. Isn't it great that you can voice your opinions and assumptions publicly?
The Lady Kate said:
Of course not... God doesn't NEED to do anything. But He must have done it somehow, correct? Since an impartial, unbiased look at the evidence clearly points to and Old Earth and Evolution, and since God does not NEED to make anything look like something it's not.... well, you connect the dots on that one.
God did not make the Earth look old...the Flood did that.
The Lady Kate said:
It was a question. This was your idea, YOU need to prove it. You specifically said that God acted in six days to give the angels a show. Prove that they needed one.
The burden of proof is on you, not me. Your the one who disagreed with my original comment. You have yet to try and disprove me. All you have none is tried to undermine my credibility by contructing a case around me instead of the evidence.