Which is better

[WalksWithChrist]

Did anyone mention that AVG is absolutely...FREE!!



http://free.grisoft.com/doc/1

Try it.

You won't go back to paying for antivirus. I promise.

 

[Izdaari Eristikon]

Norton is ok if and only if you don't let it automatically start or run anything. I get along with Norton just fine, so long as I call its features manually when I want them. Otherwise they suck up too much memory and CPU cycles, and I consider the performance loss unacceptable.

 

[SAPguy]

Another vote for AVG. I have been running it for at least 4 years with no issues.

 

[raphink]

There's no need for such programs as antiviruses. Use a secure OS and secure your computer by not opening the ports you don't need.

Vista will not get any good antivirus anyway according to Symantec and Kapersky, since it seems Live OneCare is a pain and
Vista's "security features" prevent security software editors from writing antiviruses (but not pritates from writing viruses).

Just a good time to switch to a real OS I guess...

 

[pgp_protector]

There's no need for such programs as antiviruses. Use a secure OS and secure your computer by not opening the ports you don't need.

Vista will not get any good antivirus anyway according to Symantec and Kapersky, since it seems Live OneCare is a pain and
Vista's "security features" prevent security software editors from writing antiviruses (but not pritates from writing viruses).

Just a good time to switch to a real OS I guess...

Umm. AVG Works fine on Vista.

Or are do Symantec & Kapersky say AVG is not a good AntiVirus Package ?

 

[Les Grands Pieds]

I have a Mac, so I guess I would put other, right?

 

[WalksWithChrist]

I have a Mac, so I guess I would put other, right?

I guess so!