oldsage
Veteran
- Nov 4, 2005
- 1,307
- 70
- 56
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
Normann, first off the calendar has nothing to do with the Sabbath, nothing at all, you seem to think it does, if there were no calendars in existence, the Sabbath is still ever seven days from the time God said..this is the Sabbath.Normann said:Silly? Being you brought in the word silly I take my liberty in using the same word. Is it not silly to base your salvation on a calendar that was designed in the middle 1500's by a reilgious organization. And that organization has many things it teaches that I know for sure you disagree with!
Who said anything about basing salvation on anything but the grace of God? Are you bringing up working to heaven? because the bible is clear that you get in not on your own merit.
Normann said:Is it not silly to claim you keep the orginial Sabbath, when no one on earth can prove without a doubt which day it really was?
what doubt, I believe with 100% certainty that the Sabbath falls from Friday sundown to Saturday sundown. I don't know anyone in history that would disagree with it. Because we can trace it all the way back to Jesus' time. Or we can ask a Jew that has been keeping that day for the last 4000 some odd years.
Since you have not read the thread about the topic of the calendar I will just say this..again, the calendar has nothing to do with the Sabbath. I am very well aware of the calendars and the changes in them...but it is still meaningless because the calendar has nothing to do with the Sabbath.Normann said:Is it not silly to ignore the history of the calendar and give it prefrence over the scriptures?
Normann, you believe in what I call solo scriptura which means that you believe the scripture alone is the sole authority and nothing else can be used to help understand it, and that my friend is a very dangerous teaching because you are saying that you of all the christians in the world or who have ever lived are better able to understand the meaning of the scriptures. You would disregard what has been handed down over the years as meaningless.Normann said:And as for history itself, is it not silly to put your faith in history instead of scripture?
History tells us about this struggle, history tells us about the topics we are now talking about, history tells us the direction the church has gone, history tells us how the church viewed things over the course of time. History shows us when error entered the church. History teaches us many things, like when certain churches began, and why...This historic view of the church has always been to use history to guide us, some like the Catholic churches, both the Greeks and the Latins use history a little different that the reformers, but both has seen the value of history in shaping how beliefs, the Catholics have Tradition and Scripture as equals but the Reformers have Scripture as the final, not only, authority and Tradition to help guide understanding in the scriptures.
Normann said:Those of you with a teachable spirit beware of false teachers.
Normann, this forum is set up for the purpose of sharing information, this thread has a few different views on this subject and they are being shared and tested here...This is where we hash out if what we believe is true or not, we take from here what one another says and go back and learn and see if our position is strong or weak, and we determine which view makes the best sense of the evidence and neither of us may change our minds, but at least we are aware of the agruments for each case. You seem to be going against the purpose of this forum and want to suppress what people say to take away free speech, not to share information. I would ask for you to share information and move away from doing things like saying beware of false prophets...make a case and prove your point like the rest of us are doing. If you have an opposing view, I am sure that everyone would like to see it.
God bless you and be of good courage.
Chris
Upvote
0