Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
[The OP]
Then look for an illogical one.... there's really no logical defense to it.
Isaiah 55:8 said:For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.
Are you trying to make a point, BS? If so, what is it, please?
No, there isn't, because the crust isn't uniform enough for the existing water to cover the entire surface.
According to what current understanding? From where do we know this? What is the time scale you're talking about? What was the process that caused this increase from 0% to its current 30% land coverage?
I thought it was your goal here to teach?
Sorry about that but in debates about science slick rhetoric and quick wit does not "prove" your point. To back up my points I use evidence. Could I have simplyfied my point? Yes I could have but then I would not have been able to fully explain the facts. Evidence wins the argument in science.
Good catch! You've figured out that us scientists don't believe what you say unless what you way is backed with EVIDENCE. SCIENTIFIC evidence.It sounds like you do not believe what I said.
Nor would we.You are not paying me tuition
*You tell us what you (wrongly) think.I tell you what I know.
Is this your method of teaching? If so, please tell me where you 'teach', so that I may never set foot within several tens of miles of there.You do not take it, then that is it.
Otherwise, ask one answerable question with a decent attitude, so the conversation could be continued.
I don't mind you keep doing that. However, it would then no debate.
See how much smaller the world was on this medieval Moroccan map?
The point he is trying to make is that the "world" as the Hebrews who wrote Genesis knew it was much smaller than the "world" we know today.
Good catch! You've figured out that us scientists don't believe what you say unless what you way is backed with EVIDENCE. SCIENTIFIC evidence.
Nor would we.
*You tell us what you (wrongly) think.
Is this your method of teaching? If so, please tell me where you 'teach', so that I may never set foot within several tens of miles of there.
Nobody here is giving you a bad attitude, you're just unwilling/unable to answer the questions. And if you really can only answer 1 question at a time, you're in the wrong place, bubba.
I will treat you with respect when you make a post deserving of it. Until you actually engage in a discussion, I have no reason to present you with any respect at all.It sounds like you do not believe what I said. You are not paying me tuition and I could not teach you here as in a classroom. I tell you what I know. You do not take it, then that is it.
Otherwise, ask one answerable question with a decent attitude, so the conversation could be continued.
The north and south celestial poles are the two imaginary points in the sky where the Earth'saxis of rotation, "infinitely extended", intersects the imaginary rotating sphere of stars called the celestial sphere. The north and south celestial poles appear directly overhead to an observer at the Earth's North Pole and South Pole respectively.
Due to the precession of the equinoxes the direction of the Earth's axis is very slowly but continuously changing, and as the projection of the Earth's axis moves around the celestial sphere over the millennia, the role of North Star passes from one star to another. Since the precession of the equinoxes is so slow, taking about 26,000 years to complete a cycle, a single star typically holds that title for many centuries.
In 3000 BCE the faint star Thuban in the constellation Draco was the North Star. At magnitude 3.67 (fourth magnitude) it is only one-fifth as bright as Polaris, the current North Star.
Gamma Cephei (also known as Alrai, situated 45 light-years away) will become closer to the northern celestial pole than Polaris around 3000 CE, and be at its closest approach around 4000 CE. The title of North Star then will pass to Iota Cephei (ι Cephei, situated 115 light-years away) some time around 5200 CE. The first magnitude star Vega (26 light-years away) will then become the North Star by 14000 CE.
It wouldn't be "smaller" --- it would be more like "in one piece".The point he is trying to make is that the "world" as the Hebrews who wrote Genesis knew it was much smaller than the "world" we know today.
It wouldn't be "smaller" --- it would be more like "in one piece".
The total landmass would not have been scattered all over the globe prior to Genesis 10.
(Yes --- I know --- the Hebrews didn't exist as yet prior to Genesis 10.)
So, is it possible for them to have an idea about the north pole?
If you think they could, then where would be the most likely place for them to take as the north pole?
I disagree.1. Genesis 10 says nothing whatsoever about the breakup of Pangea. Obviously the writers knew nothing about Pangea, since they did not live millions of years ago.
Even though I showed how that, in my [pet] opinion, Noah lived in what is now New Jersey?2. Regardless of whether or not there was one continent or many during The Flood, the writers of Genesis knew of only a small part of the entire world.
Based on what? Faulty "science" made up by incompetent, God-hating "scientists?"I disagree.
When did you show that? I must have missed it.Even though I showed how that, in my [pet] opinion, Noah lived in what is now New Jersey?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?