Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Correct me if Im Wrong but both Cataholics and Orthodox Gotta do some spiritual gymnastics depending on which one you are, you aren't pure enough to approach God till youve either been to confession or you cant pray to God directly so you gotta go through a Saint
I think if these questions are answered it would help to see what this debate is really about
maybe I missed it becouse this is the first time Ive read this passage but what did they need Pharmakia for? becouse this definitely sounds like voodoo dude
then there is medicinal value to smoking fish livers and hearts ? it sounds like they might have been smokin something else if you know what I mean![]()
that's Good becouse its the only one we see practiced in scriptureYou are wrong. The normal mode of prayer is to the Father through Jesus.
true dat I mean why would you when you can go straight to the CreatorNobody has to pray to a Saint or via a Saint.
you must be smokin fish guts bro cuz Ive never heard a protestant make a big deal outta it they just dont do it cuz it would distract from our God. Im sure it seems like a big deal on this thread cuz were talkin about it. but I assure you the attitude at my Church is Mary was blessed for being chosen by her Creator but to pray to her is a waste of time becouse shes worshiping God not acting as a heavenly switchboard operator for our prayers. We go straight to the source from where all blessing flowIt's protestants that make a big thing about our asking Saints for their intercession.
Mary has no business being on the cross at all.For it is not her blood shed for sins but Christ alone.
maybe Im wrong but it looks like Her mands are pierced ? ouch thats gonna bleed
So what's your point house of straw? You want these people to come back to true Catholism? I'm not Catholic so don't take it from me, but it has be stated over and over again, that this type of thing is not in keeping with the teachings of their church. Nobody posting on this board is advocating or condoning it, so who are you debating?
IMO, this does not look like "Mary crucified"; the representation of Mary and the Christ child that you show is actually the icon of an event in the 'history of salvation" - it is known as an icon of the Incarnation (not the Theotokos).
To summarize, the cross you show represents the "history of salvation" -- it includes the incarnation, the crucifixion and -as in the EO, the crucifixion is a reminder also of the resurrection, the resurrection as well.
![]()
maybe Im wrong but it looks like Her mands are pierced ? ouch thats gonna bleed
I beg to differ. This sort of thing is in keeping with the general tenor of the Marian dogmas declared to be infallible in the mid-twentieth century by the Pope. The results of these pronouncements have been far-reaching. The apparent intent was to further solidify the unique identity of the RCC in opposition to other denominations. One result was that it created a larger chasm between the RCC and the EOC, as well as the Protestant denominations. Another has been that it fueled much of the latent Mariology within Roman Catholicism which is now pressing the papacy to infallibly proclaim Mary as co-redemptrix.
Given the OP, this is in keeping with the discussion at hand.