Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Where is your evidence creationists?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="RickG" data-source="post: 59517840" data-attributes="member: 293581"><p>From your outstanding creationist credentials:</p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span>What is so interesting about Gentry is that his work at Oakridge was with a team of scientists who were given the task of finding a way to accelerate decay rates of radioactive material so it could be rendered harmless after being expended in nuclear reactors. What Gentry's team found out was that they could not change decay rates using many methods far exceeding any natural environment they may encounter.</p><p></p><p>Gentry should know better than anyone that decay rates cannot be changed and that radiometric dating is exceedingly valid. His idea on radio halos in Polonium are completely ridiculous and well refuted many times over.</p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Arial'"></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="RickG, post: 59517840, member: 293581"] From your outstanding creationist credentials: [FONT=Arial] [/FONT]What is so interesting about Gentry is that his work at Oakridge was with a team of scientists who were given the task of finding a way to accelerate decay rates of radioactive material so it could be rendered harmless after being expended in nuclear reactors. What Gentry's team found out was that they could not change decay rates using many methods far exceeding any natural environment they may encounter. Gentry should know better than anyone that decay rates cannot be changed and that radiometric dating is exceedingly valid. His idea on radio halos in Polonium are completely ridiculous and well refuted many times over. [FONT=Arial] [/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Where is your evidence creationists?
Top
Bottom