Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Where is your evidence creationists?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="USincognito" data-source="post: 59492723" data-attributes="member: 21511"><p>Gosh, you sure came on strong for someone who apparently doesn't know bupkiss about what she's arguing against.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who says that other than Creationists? It's already been explained to you. The Big Bang wasn't a bang, nor was it something from nothing. The entire Universe was in a singularity that started expanding (sounds like Genesis 1 doesn't it). About 10 billion years later, the sun and it's accretion disk began to form the solar system out of hydrogen and heavier elements created in earlier supernovas. Where in this scenario do you find "sudden" and "BANG" when it comes to the solar system?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>What are you, a speciest? No live for bacteria, plants and fungi? Your salad wouldn't be as delicious if it only contained animal (and yeah, humans are animals) matter.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Who knows? We've detected amino acids in space and found the building blocks of life seem to permiate the cosmos. There might be simple life on many planets througout the universe, but the possibility that complex and intelligent life can exist only on Earth is equally as likely as the possibility that it could fill the galaxy.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The wise man Carl Sagan offered some possibilities. Perhaps we're the first. Perhaps we're the last. Perhaps Earth is the only planet that can support intelligent life. To him, and to me, the latter seems like an awful waste. </p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Mutation and natural selection. Why would one try and engage in the debate over evolution if one does not understand the basics of it?</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Loaded question, and raises the spectre of "I won't believe in evolution until an iguana gives birth to a crow". There are examples of speciation that occur within human lifetimes, but if you will only accept something that actually would faslify evolution, then no, we can't help you (on several levels).</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Do you need a time machine to know that the Spartans held off the Persians at Thermopylea? Because we have more evidence that evolution has occured and of deep time than that that battle occured or what it's outcome was.</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>Missing Link is an anachronistic 19th Century term that anyone serious about engaging in the Crevo debate should avoid. The proper term is transitional fossil and yes, there are literally thousands of them that have been unearthed over the last 160+ years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="USincognito, post: 59492723, member: 21511"] Gosh, you sure came on strong for someone who apparently doesn't know bupkiss about what she's arguing against. Who says that other than Creationists? It's already been explained to you. The Big Bang wasn't a bang, nor was it something from nothing. The entire Universe was in a singularity that started expanding (sounds like Genesis 1 doesn't it). About 10 billion years later, the sun and it's accretion disk began to form the solar system out of hydrogen and heavier elements created in earlier supernovas. Where in this scenario do you find "sudden" and "BANG" when it comes to the solar system? What are you, a speciest? No live for bacteria, plants and fungi? Your salad wouldn't be as delicious if it only contained animal (and yeah, humans are animals) matter. Who knows? We've detected amino acids in space and found the building blocks of life seem to permiate the cosmos. There might be simple life on many planets througout the universe, but the possibility that complex and intelligent life can exist only on Earth is equally as likely as the possibility that it could fill the galaxy. The wise man Carl Sagan offered some possibilities. Perhaps we're the first. Perhaps we're the last. Perhaps Earth is the only planet that can support intelligent life. To him, and to me, the latter seems like an awful waste. Mutation and natural selection. Why would one try and engage in the debate over evolution if one does not understand the basics of it? Loaded question, and raises the spectre of "I won't believe in evolution until an iguana gives birth to a crow". There are examples of speciation that occur within human lifetimes, but if you will only accept something that actually would faslify evolution, then no, we can't help you (on several levels). Do you need a time machine to know that the Spartans held off the Persians at Thermopylea? Because we have more evidence that evolution has occured and of deep time than that that battle occured or what it's outcome was. Missing Link is an anachronistic 19th Century term that anyone serious about engaging in the Crevo debate should avoid. The proper term is transitional fossil and yes, there are literally thousands of them that have been unearthed over the last 160+ years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Where is your evidence creationists?
Top
Bottom