Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well that is a refreshing honesty on this forum Mandy, I appriciate that.I could have looked it up, and 'put it in my own words.' But I'm a straight shooter, I will admit that I don't understand the complexities of the scientific method, but I do know that its something atheists point to as their EVIDENCE, I'm just saying that I believe its a sacred cow, thats all.
My problem is that you showed no evidence.
I agree with ianb321red, for me Robin Hood, Dick Tracey, Sherlock Holmes and King Arthur were all real people and untill you can prove to me with evidence that they were not I'm saying they were.And remember, I'm not bothered whether you accept the evidence or not...I'm justifying my argument and my position. I'm not trying to convince you or anyone else to accept what I consider to be evidence.
That fact is, that my position (and belief) is based on objective evidence. This means it's available for anybody to test and attest in order to challenge and disprove it. That's what objectivity means. It's not my own personal evidence.
So I repeat, until anyone can demonstrate convincingly that the evidence for The Bible is indeed inaccurate, then it holds that The Bible is an historically accurate account.
So the challenge remains - show me a more convincing alternative history than The Biblical one and then we can begin to have a proper discussion. Until you can do that you do not have a counter argument worth listening to.
Sure I'll start.So the challenge remains - show me a more convincing alternative history than The Biblical one and then we can begin to have a proper discussion. Until you can do that you do not have a counter argument worth listening to.
Still more believable than the biblical story.Francis Bacon was a sea shell. Me?
Every time, that's why the not so smart are attracted to religion.more believable than the materialistic stories
Evidence for what? That the Bible is accurate?
Didn't I quote a half dozen non-religious historical sources that can be cross referenced to support the accuracy of The Bible?
Didn't I quote directly from "The Annals"?
Did you actually bother to read my post?
Please explain what "no evidence" means!!
And remember, I'm not bothered whether you accept the evidence or not...I'm justifying my argument and my position. I'm not trying to convince you or anyone else to accept what I consider to be evidence.
That fact is, that my position (and belief) is based on objective evidence. This means it's available for anybody to test and attest in order to challenge and disprove it. That's what objectivity means. It's not my own personal evidence.
So I repeat, until anyone can demonstrate convincingly that the evidence for The Bible is indeed inaccurate, then it holds that The Bible is an historically accurate account.
So the challenge remains - show me a more convincing alternative history than The Biblical one and then we can begin to have a proper discussion. Until you can do that you do not have a counter argument worth listening to.
I can't remember the source, but I do recall reading that the book of Daniel is believed to have been written after the events that were prophesied in it.
sorry but this image is wrong.
Steps of the Scientific Method
Ask a question --> Do background research --> Construct a hypothesis --> Test hypothesis --> Analise data --> Communicate results
anyway that image is just a poor copy of this
which i have not seen a rebuttal to btw
no rebuttal? I'm not surprised.We've all got our charts. Very cool!!!
no rebuttal? I'm not surprised.
That must be why Christianity is the only religion in the world, hang on it's not is it? approx 5 billion people believe in religions other than Christianity don't they? I wonder why that is when it should be obvious to everyone that Christianity is the one because of it's historical, prophetical and archaeological accuracy, or could that be just be the opinion of it's believers.The validation of the text in terms of historical accuracy, prophetical accuracy, Archaeological accuracy and so on exists outside of the biblical text and can be applied irrespective of religious belief or disposition.
Therefore hundreds of religions, yours is just one of hundreds of right and true religions.There isn't one country, one language, one culture, one shoe to fit all.
That must be why Christianity is the only religion in the world, hang on it's not is it? approx 5 billion people believe in religions other than Christianity don't they? I wonder why that is when it should be obvious to everyone that Christianity is the one because of it's historical, prophetical and archaeological accuracy, or could that be just be the opinion of it's believers.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?