There's no need for faith. They're interesting hypothetical possibilities, predictions of physical models.I don't think I'll ever get used to atheists promoting multiverse theories, and "bang" theories that require "blind faith" in four supernatural (human imagination) constructs.
There's no need for faith. They're interesting hypothetical possibilities, predictions of physical models.
It's at the bottom of the heap because it has no basis in any plausible physical model or theory.What was your actual beef with the interesting hypothetical possibility of an "intelligent creator" again?
It's at the bottom of the heap because it has no basis in any plausible physical model or theory.
Like I said, they are predictions or extrapolations of current physical models. String theory is a mathematical model that provides some useful descriptive and mathematical tools; multiverse concepts are logical predictions of inflation, quantum superposition, M-theory, even of our whole universe being many times larger than the observable universe.And somehow you find string theory or multiverse concepts more "plausible"? How exactly does that rationalization work?
Like I said, they are predictions or extrapolations of current physical models.
String theory is a mathematical model that provides some useful descriptive and mathematical tools;
multiverse concepts are logical predictions of inflation,
quantum superposition,
M-theory,
even of our whole universe being many times larger than the observable universe.
What was your actual beef with the interesting hypothetical possibility of an "intelligent creator" again?
Er, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but "current physical models" are based upon four unique forms of "supernatural" constructs to start with. Talk about building your argument on pure supernatural quicksand!
I didn't say it validated anything, nor did I say that any of the other multiverse models were 'validated'. As I said, I think they are interesting hypotheses based on current physical models.... It could be infinite and eternal for all I know, but that in no way validates any of your aforementioned ideas.
It's at the bottom of the heap because it has no basis in any plausible physical model or theory.
It's untestable, fallacious nonsense.
cue a cosmology rant in 3...2...1...
I didn't say it validated anything, nor did I say that any of the other multiverse models were 'validated'. As I said, I think they are interesting hypotheses based on current physical models.
Your opinion of those models is your own prerogative, but irrelevant.
At least we can agree that basing anything on supernatural shenannigans, is a bad thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?