that is changing the bars, you originally said it was illogical for someone to burn in hell forever, if I am quoting you correctly, so I was using relativity to suggest that hell may be in a dimension outside of time. So if it is, then it would not be illogical for someone to burn forever, which was your premise. Now you want evidence of hell, and I could give it to you but that would be considered apologetics. But as I said to another person here who said hell is not a credible threat. What is more logical, to believe nothing? To believe the soul is gone, turns off? When dead? Or to believe it goes somewhere? These are all questions I don't see atheist's bold enough to debate. Because by and large the atheist is a skeptic, which by definition questions everything. But in doing so, is it really logical? I mean to have no beliefs at all? I don't think so. At this point we come to a cross roads. The atheist has faiths and beliefs in the after life, but is not willing to verbalize them, or debate them. And thus comes the word from my mouth, "cowardly," The other option is they have never thought about it. And this is a valid choice. But again just because they have never contemplated something does make everyone else who does have a view, wrong by default. Do you know what I mean? There must be some illogicality that they are referencing to, that makes hell illogical, and they again, are awkwardly silent at that point. But an important point to make is that the soul, the software that runs the brain, is massless. Somehow it turns on at birth, and at that event is placed into a timelessness. See the soul has no mass, which means it can't be affected by time. So it's eternal according to relivity. So a hell that is eternal makes perfect sense. But just saying it turns off, well is sort of naive. I am not saying you believe that. But just saying what I have heard before. So I am sorry if I didn't answer your question the way you wanted, I still said some stuff that needed to be said.