• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where does morality come from?

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Though I do feel compelled to note that your expansions is flawed because it assumes a subjective morality. You say that morality has changed over 200 years, but all we can say is that the common interpretation has changed. If this common interpretation defines morality, then yes it has changed, but if that is the case it was never distinct from human opinion anyway.

Well, not really; it is possible that there is an objective moral value but it is very broad: "Be loving", for example, or "Cause no harm".

Not that I believe this :) I just don't think it's incompatible with the notion that people's moral standards have shifted over the centuries.
 
Upvote 0

cantata

Queer non-theist, with added jam.
Feb 20, 2007
6,215
683
38
Oxford, UK
✟32,193.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
What does it mean for a moral value to be objective? Objective reality is something that everyone can observe, but it is impossible to observe morals; they are concepts and ideas, not 'things'.

I agree with you.

However, there are many people who argue in favour of objective moral values, and usually they think of them as non-natural qualities. They are objective in the sense that they exist whether or not people know about them (unless you take a constructivist stance, as Kant does, which I won't go into).

To avoid intuitionism and all of its pitfalls, it seems best to adopt an externalist stance (that moral judgements are not inherently motivating), and also to argue that these moral non-natural qualities are constituted by some set of natural qualities.
 
Upvote 0

Crazy Liz

Well-Known Member
Oct 28, 2003
17,090
1,106
California
✟23,305.00
Faith
Christian
Well, not really; it is possible that there is an objective moral value but it is very broad: "Be loving", for example, or "Cause no harm".

Not that I believe this :) I just don't think it's incompatible with the notion that people's moral standards have shifted over the centuries.
Not just over the centuries, but among different cultures that exist contemporaneously, side-by-side.
 
Upvote 0