• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Where did Sacred Tradtion originate from?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Anglian

let us love one another, for love is of God
Oct 21, 2007
8,092
1,246
Held
✟28,241.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
IT has been great discussing with you all.. I am not going to be here for a while. We have had a medical emergancy in my family that calls me away from home. I will be praying for you and know that I love you in the Love of the Lord..

Dear MamaZ,

My prayers are with you and your family. May the Lord bless you all and keep you.

Peace,

Anglian
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
I have read that but we don't see the instructions for us to try and pray for these people nor pray to these people. This is an add on as are the Icons. Never written about in the NT scripture..

Where are the instructions in the NT not to sleep with animals?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Then all writings are suspect, wherever they come from.
No. That's why Sacred Tradition is important. There were 'floating around' dozens and dozens of 'texts (see http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/) for just how many.

These books can seem to be about Christ, and Christianity. It was the church that was able to determine which were to be compiled in the Bible

The only thing that counts is behavior, and that disqualifies 'Tradition', because the history of tradition makes for horrifying reading that is cited daily of those who have brought Christ into disrepute. Peter's prophetic words 'Many will follow their shameful ways and will bring the way of truth into disrepute' are manifestly fulfilled in the RCC in particular. The news media have not ceased from adding to that history.
Ah, but we can judge claims that a false based on our knowledge of what's true.
There is no reason to suppose that Timothy failed to carry out his instructions, but, assuming that he did not, we do not have one name that identifies any one of these reliable men. Moreover, we do not know that these men were not all imprisoned or killed, and their influence entirely negated. It is obviously likely to be the false teachers mentioned who would be involved in such dark deeds, and they would of course posture as the successors to the reliable men.

To claim succession of that sort is therefore self-condemning, though it is plainly absurd to claim succession and be totally unable even to provide proper documentary evidence of succession.


The 'gates of hell' being possibly the RCC and its wealthy friends? That is not what the term may mean. Jesus meant that there would be no eternal condemnation for those with faith in him, not that there would always be an identifiable church. The history of the church will be written on the Last Day, and not a moment before.


Ironic, is it not, that the explicit warning of the man claimed as first 'pope' is completely ignored by his claimed followers!
I am not offering support for the Papacy. I believe that the claims for the Papacy can be judged false based on readings of Ignatius of Antioch, et al.

Why do you think the Apostles established the offices of deacon, priest and bishop and asked us to obey them?
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
where does it say in the NT where we are to hold any day of the week over any other? We are to hold every day Holy unto the Lord for we are called to be Holy..

That's in Acts. They came together on a particular day
 
Upvote 0

Ramon96

Eastern Orthodox Christian
Nov 4, 2006
360
25
NY, NY
Visit site
✟23,086.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
So God Spoke to someone and told them to make statues of people? When in His written scriptures we see this.

Well, He told them to make Statues and Icons of Angels and such. Just read the Scriptures I gave you. Let me repeat this.

"And you shall make two cherubim of gold; of hammered work shall you make them, on the two ends of the mercy seat. Make one cherub on the one end, and one cherub on the other end; of one piece of the mercy seat shall you make the cherubim on its two ends. The cherubim shall spread out their wings above, overshadowing the mercy seat with their wings, their faces one to another; toward the mercy seat shall the faces of the cherubim be" (Ex. 25:18–20).

David gave Solomon the plan "for the altar of incense made of refined gold, and its weight; also his plan for the golden chariot of the cherubim that spread their wings and covered the ark of the covenant of the Lord. All this he made clear by the writing of the hand of the Lord concerning it all, all the work to be done according to the plan" (1 Chr. 28:18–19).

Similarly Ezekiel 41:17–18 describes graven (carved) images in the idealized temple he was shown in a vision, for he writes, "On the walls round about in the inner room and [on] the nave were carved likenesses of cherubim."

Holy Scriptures does not forbid Holy Icons, only the worship of such. The Scripture you posted only deals with the worship of these things, which is why God got mad. The Holy Temple/The Ark were full of Icons/Statues of Angels. We honor, not worship, the Saints and Angels in our Holy Icons. Holy Icons originated from the OT, and the Early Christians will make images of the cross, fish, etc, which all symbolize Christ.

Apparently, you cannot answer why God commanded the making of Statues and Icons. He commanded them not to worship them. You still have not answer why these Scriptures are "false" (it has to be in your Protestant theology).

Do you object to illustrated Gospel tracts [to lead people to salvation]? You know those Baptist and other Protestant Gospel tracts which has pictures of Angels, Christ, and stuff?

Do you have pictures of family and friends or you? Well those who are "icons" by definition ["An image; a representation", "a usually pictorial representation; image" according to online Dictionaries and my personal dictionaries]. The picture you have on the left side of your name is a "icon". Do you object to those?

I don't see them as praying but holding golden bowels filled with the prayers of Gods people..Who do you believe the 24 elders are?

Yes, these Angels offer God our Prayers. Why can't you see that?

"An angel came and stood at the altar [in heaven] with a golden censer; and he was given much incense to mingle with the prayers of all the saints upon the golden altar before the throne; and the smoke of the incense rose with the prayers of the saints from the hand of the angel before God" (Rev. 8:3-4).

Humans as well offer prayers to God for us. John sees that "the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each holding a harp, and with golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints" (Rev. 5:8). The simple fact is, as this passage shows: The saints in heaven offer to God the prayers of the saints on earth.

Are the Elders and such excluded from "God's People"?

Can someone show me where the Apostles taught to make graven images and icons?

Yes, I can see that you are ignoring what the OT said. So do everything have to repeated in the NT in order to be true and genuine? Does the NT forbid us to make Icons?

where does it say in the NT where we are to hold any day of the week over any other? We are to hold every day Holy unto the Lord for we are called to be Holy..

Well the Holy Apostles will gather on the first day of the week for worship and the partaking of the Holy Communion [Acts 20:7, etc]. The Early Christians follow in the Tradition of the Holy Apostles and worship on the first day of the week and to partake of the Divine Eucharist (Holy Communion). Don't you celebrate your Birthday on a particular day? About your friends and family members birthdays? About your Anniversary? Don't you regard that day as "special"?

For if Christ intercedes or us why would we need the saints to intercede for us? For is not Christ all in all? We only see written that Christ forever lives to intercede for us. Not the saints.

Then why do we need our Brother and Sisters today to pray for us then? The Holy Apostles actually ask other Christians to pray for him. We are commanded to pray for others. This is no different than asking Saints in heaven to pray for us.

1 Timothy 2:5, Paul says that Christians should intercede: "First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men, for kings and all who are in high positions, that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life, godly and respectful in every way. This is good, and pleasing to God our Savior, who desires all men to be saved and to come to the knowledge of the truth" (1 Tim. 2:1–4). Clearly, then, intercessory prayers offered by Christians on behalf of others is something "good and pleasing to God".

"The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much." (James 5:16, b).

Saint Paul directly asks others to pray for him (Rom. 15:30–32, Eph. 6:18–20, Col. 4:3, 1 Thess. 5:25, 2 Thess. 3:1), and he assured them that he was praying for them as well (2 Thess. 1:11). Most fundamentally, Jesus himself required us to pray for others, and not only for those who asked us to do so (Matt. 5:44).

So please ask Jesus Christ and Saint Paul "For if Christ intercedes or us why would we need the saints to intercede for us?" for they said Christians should pray for others and ask them to pray for them. Certainty, as we have seen from Scriptures, just because Christ intercede for us [that the most important intercession] this does not forbid us from prayer for others and asking others to pray for us.

Of course you reject all this ONLY because it doesn't agree with your [21st Century] Protestant Theology.

I am still waiting for you to actually have a discussion and answer all my comments one by one, and not just pick and choose which you want to comment. I am still waiting for you to actually comment on the Scriptures I have posted. You haven't because it does not agree with your particular belief.

Blessings,
Ramon

P.S, my prayers are with you and your family.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Anglian

let us love one another, for love is of God
Oct 21, 2007
8,092
1,246
Held
✟28,241.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Dear Montalban,

Don't you just love it when people make remarks about Catholics without reading your Faith icon?

It is almost as amusing as their determination not to read how Holy Tradition is a dynamic forces handed down by Christ Himself, as opposed to the static tradition of the Jews which He condemned.

And it is quite as amusing as their continued assertion of their own tradition that the whole thing was started up by Constantine - a view not shared by scholars such as Ehrman and Metzger - but adopted by novelists like Dan Brown. Perhaps someone should tell these folk that Brown's book, like their views, are fiction?

Best of luck in the dialogue.

peace,

Anglian
 
Upvote 0

katherine2001

Veteran
Jun 24, 2003
5,986
1,065
68
Billings, MT
Visit site
✟11,346.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The church condemns 'tradition' as the works of the enemies of Christ.


An heretical 'Bible'.

Catholic circularity comes round yet again!

Montalban, Anglian and many others of us are not Catholic--we are ORTHODOX. If our Bible (including the New Testament) is heretical, why do you use it? Why doesn't your church come up with its own New Testament? Why do you use a "heretical" Bible?
 
Upvote 0

calluna

Regular Member
Apr 23, 2008
2,237
114
✟25,394.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Private
If our Bible (including the New Testament) is heretical, why do you use it?
I don't.

Why doesn't your church come up with its own New Testament?
It has done. Why don't you people read what is written? Or is it a case of not facing up to the truth?
 
Upvote 0

Anglian

let us love one another, for love is of God
Oct 21, 2007
8,092
1,246
Held
✟28,241.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Montalban, Anglian and many others of us are not Catholic--we are ORTHODOX. If our Bible (including the New Testament) is heretical, why do you use it? Why doesn't your church come up with its own New Testament? Why do you use a "heretical" Bible?
Dear Katherine,

Some folk just don't read what others write; some have difficulty facing up to facts well-attested in the scholarship; and some just like telling us about their private revelation. All of which continues to underline the importance of the Orthodox understanding of Holy Tradition.

Peace,

Anglian
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.