- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,211
- 52,660
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
RickG?Na, not Glenn. This is an actual person I know.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
RickG?Na, not Glenn. This is an actual person I know.
Still looking for that "young earth scientist" with a PhD in a relevant geological field?
Still looking for that "young earth scientist" with a PhD in a relevant geological field?
LOLAppeal to Bandwagon proves nothing. The argument stands or falls on its own merit. Neither is it specifically required that a scientist be a geologist in order for him to detect when a bogus theory is being proposed and blatant irrationality is being dressed up as if it were an acceptable part of the scientific method. In fact, any person who has a basic familiarity what the scientific method demands can readily detect blatant deviations from its principles. So once again your premise is seriously defective.
Or maybe you don't science well.
Ignore away. Your PRATT's were starting to wear a little thin.I think you are projecting your own intellectual deficiencies on others.
Me? I passed my science classes with flying colors.
In any case, I think you are best placed on my ignore list since you are beginning to clutter my screen with irrelevant inanities.
BTW
Try a gymnasium and punching a heavy bag.
It will be less stressful on your delicately wired cerebral synapses.
The way you brandish the term "Scientific Method" around is indicative of a person with very limited education who is so impressed by what he feels is infinitely beyond his own ken that everyone else must surely be equally as handicapped.Ignore away. Your PRATT's were starting to wear a little thin.
Check in later when you've boned up on the scientific method, and why your assertions are patently absurd.
Ciao.
It's "kin," BTW.The way you brandish the term "Scientific Method" around is indicative of a person with very limited education who is so impressed by what he feels is infinitely beyond his own ken that everyone one else must surely be equally as handicapped.
A deficiency of basic education in the hard sciences is usually the cause of such a ridiculous pompous display.
Very Sad indeed!
So you think he meant to type k-i-n, and inadvertently typed k-e-n?Correcting typos is petty.
So you think he meant to type k-i-n, and inadvertently typed k-e-n?
Or maybe he actually thought the word was "ken."
Or maybe he actually thought the word was "ken."
The way you brandish the term "Scientific Method" around is indicative of a person with very limited education who is so impressed by what he feels is infinitely beyond his own ken that everyone one else must surely be equally as handicapped.
A deficiency of basic education in the hard sciences is usually the cause of such a ridiculous pompous display.
Very Sad indeed!
Or maybe he actually meant to use the word "ken". (Reading the post in question, in context, this would make sense.)
Ken:
" the range of perception, understanding, or knowledge."
Synonyms: knowledge, awareness, perception, understanding, grasp, comprehension, realization, appreciation, consciousness