Where are all the bones?

[Radrook]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossil#Permineralization

Well, if it is really Satan then he is becoming a bit lax because some recent dino fossils don't quite jive with the millions of years which evolution demands.

Of course after recovering from the initial shock to their basic beliefs which require millions of years, and which included a belief that soft tissue could never survive such a duration of time, atheist archeologists immediately began furiously seeking a way to reconcile such a serious discrepancy with what they propose to be undeniably true.

The article describes what they finally are proposing as an acceptable viable explanation from their new viewpoint. So now their universe doesn't seem so topsy turvy to them anymore again.

So I guess the Devil's Dino scamming archeological sloppiness almost induced a heart attack this time.

Dino Soft Tissue Issue Attempted Evolutionist Explanation
http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

 

[RickG]

Well, if it is really Satan then he is becoming a bit lax because some recent dino fossils don't quite jive with the millions of years which evolution demands.

I would like to see the source where you got that information. Understanding my interest in your post is not evolution but the dinosaur fossil age question.

 

[Radrook]

I would like to see the source where you got that information. Understanding my interest in your post is not evolution but the dinosaur fossil age question.

Sorry, I compose my posts and sometimes add material later.
Here is the link:

Dino Soft Tissue
http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

 

[RickG]

Sorry, I compose my posts and sometimes add material later.
Here is the link:

Dino Soft Tissue
http://www.livescience.com/41537-t-rex-soft-tissue.html

Seriously? Do you have any idea how the soft tissue came about?

 

[Radrook]

Seriously? Do you have any idea how the soft tissue came about?

Well, there are Young Earth Scientists who view that discovery as indisputable evidence which proves that the claims of millions of years for such fossils was wrong all along.

Not surprisingly, evolutionists cited in the article strive to reconcile their evolutionary theory which depends on millions of years with the new discovery by explaining how chemical processes involving iron in the tissue could have made it possible. A complete about face from their previously opinion that such a thing was totally impossible.

But one can understand why they must find an explanation since otherwise they would have to totally discard every single thing that they have been proposing since Darwin and that is totally unacceptable from their standpoint.

In short, there is NOTHING which they can discover which can prove them wrong because they will always figure out a way to get around evidence which indicates that they are wrong via a proposal of some mechanism which just might have been the reason for the serious discrepancy.

But if it is the Devil who is forging those fossils as was suggested, then he sure took them for a ride this time.

LOL!

Dinosaur soft tissue
In seeming desperation, evolutionists turn to iron to preserve the idea of millions of years.
http://creation.com/dinosaur-soft-tissue

 

[HitchSlap]

Well, there are Young Earth Scientists...

There is no such thing as a "Young Earth Scientists."

 

[Radrook]

There is no such thing as a "Young Earth Scientists."

Your premise is profoundly defective.

No Theist is a True Scientist?
http://scienceagainstevolution.org/v5i10f.htm

That's identical to the "NO true Scotsman!" fallacy.

 

[AV1611VET]

In short, there is NOTHING which they can discover which can prove them wrong because they will always figure out a way to get around evidence which indicates that they are wrong via a proposal of some mechanism which just might have been the reason for the serious discrepancy.

A lot of science's junk can be force-fitted by computer programs, as well as trial-and-error.

And if they have to, they will even rig votes in their favor.

 

[Radrook]

A lot of science's junk can be force-fitted by computer programs, as well as trial-and-error.

And if they have to, they will even rig votes in their favor.

The human capacity for irrationality truly has no bounds!

 

[HitchSlap]

The human capacity for irrationality truly has no bounds!

You being example #1.

 

[Radrook]

You being example #1.

Ah! Ah! Ah! Please note that no direct personal attacks are allowed in the forum. It is against the rules.

 

[HitchSlap]

Your premise is profoundly defective.



That's identical to the "NO true Scotsman!" fallacy.

Do you have an example of an actual "young earth scientist" - the kind with an actual degree in a relevant geological field?

I know a Christian who is an old earth scientist. He has a relevant PhD in geology, and is employed by a large oil company in Texas to help find oil. Guess what none of his co-workers are.

 

[HitchSlap]

Ah! Ah! Ah! Please note that no direct personal attacks are allowed in the forum. It is against the rules.

So don't take it personally.

 

[AV1611VET]

I know a Christian who is an old earth scientist. He has a relevant PhD in geology, and is employed by a large oil company in Texas to help find oil. Guess what none of his co-workers are.

Glenn Morton?

He called me Omphalos, as did Aron-ra.

 

[Radrook]

So don't take it personally.

Don't make it personal. Discuss the idea or make general statements as the rules require. Otherwise it discourages discussion or can or in the case of the less emotionally stable or mature, turn it into a name-calling contest. I don't engage in that sort of thing. I simply use my ignore option.

 

[Radrook]

Do you have an example of an actual "young earth scientist" - the kind with an actual degree in a relevant geological field?

I know a Christian who is an old earth scientist. He has a relevant PhD in geology, and is employed by a large oil company in Texas to help find oil. Guess what none of his co-workers are.

That is the bandwagon fallacy.

BTW
Here is the irrationality I was referring to:

Carbon-14-dated dinosaur bones are less than 40,000 years old
http://newgeology.us/presentation48.html

Anyone who calls that fanatical, evolutionist reaction rational is irrational himself or doesn't know what irrationality is.

 

[HitchSlap]

Don't make it personal. Discuss the idea or make general statements as the rules require. Otherwise it discourages discussion or can or in the case of the less emotionally stable or mature, turn it into a name-calling contest. I don't engage in that sort of thing. I simply use my ignore option.

Feel free to ignore what you want to.

 

[HitchSlap]

That is the bandwagon fallacy.

Still looking for that "young earth scientist" with a PhD in a relevant geological field?

 

[HitchSlap]

Glenn Morton?

He called me Omphalos, as did Aron-ra.

Na, not Glenn. This is an actual person I know.

 

[HitchSlap]

That is the bandwagon fallacy.

BTW
Here is the irrationality I was referring to:


Anyone who calls that evolutionist reaction rational is irrational himself or doesn't know what irrationality is.

Or maybe you don't science well.