• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

When Worlds collide...Is it all or nothing

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,388
524
Parts Unknown
✟518,629.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I guess I don't know how to get through to you. So why not deal with the facts involved. What is the ice core data from the site of Glacier Girl airplane recovery. In other words how many layers were there?

You will find that they don't know because there was no scientific measurements made in the Glacier Girl recovery. The incident has nothing at all to do with ice core dating.

As for the layers equalling years I am in agreement but the process is far more involved then merely counting layers as you would count tree rings. Which means the method of verification is much more involved also and involves other methods such as isotope presence to determine age.
i understand exactly what you are saying I just don't agree with you.

the air plain recovery has an indrect not direct. it is important for what it tells us about the growth rate of the ice pack. in 40 years the acculamated to 250 feet that is an avrage of 6.5 feet per year. that is a known fact. The illustartion of the ice core samp at 19 cm has 11 years of growth according to the theroy.

I know they are not the same sample, but there whole way of mesuring they years is by light and dark variation in the ice. That is not a stable way of mesuring. you must have a fixed point to determine the starting mesurement and then measure from there.

what the air plane mesusrement tells us is that the rate of growth in not consistant with the standard scientific thinking and must be rethought
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,388
524
Parts Unknown
✟518,629.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
the question that needs to be asked are

1. what are the lengths of the ice cores that have already been pulled out

2. was there a bench mark for the beginning of the test?

3. what was the anual rain fall. if you don't know this? how do you determine the growth rate.
 
Upvote 0

RC_NewProtestants

Senior Veteran
May 2, 2006
2,766
63
Washington State
Visit site
✟25,750.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I can't make it any plainer I guess. This seems so obvious to me and clearly to the rest of those involved with the science, there is no scholarly argument against the ice core dating based upon the planes. Of course ice cores are not based upon glacial ice so I don't know what to tell you.
 
Upvote 0

Adventist Dissident

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Sep 18, 2006
5,388
524
Parts Unknown
✟518,629.00
Country
United States
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
RC

on this issue we will have to agree to disagree. there are just to many things that don't make sense about the postion you are advocating. I thought it was a good conversation though. thanks for the good exchange
 
Upvote 0