- Sep 18, 2006
- 5,388
- 524
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Others
i understand exactly what you are saying I just don't agree with you.I guess I don't know how to get through to you. So why not deal with the facts involved. What is the ice core data from the site of Glacier Girl airplane recovery. In other words how many layers were there?
You will find that they don't know because there was no scientific measurements made in the Glacier Girl recovery. The incident has nothing at all to do with ice core dating.
As for the layers equalling years I am in agreement but the process is far more involved then merely counting layers as you would count tree rings. Which means the method of verification is much more involved also and involves other methods such as isotope presence to determine age.
the air plain recovery has an indrect not direct. it is important for what it tells us about the growth rate of the ice pack. in 40 years the acculamated to 250 feet that is an avrage of 6.5 feet per year. that is a known fact. The illustartion of the ice core samp at 19 cm has 11 years of growth according to the theroy.
I know they are not the same sample, but there whole way of mesuring they years is by light and dark variation in the ice. That is not a stable way of mesuring. you must have a fixed point to determine the starting mesurement and then measure from there.
what the air plane mesusrement tells us is that the rate of growth in not consistant with the standard scientific thinking and must be rethought
Upvote
0