- Dec 11, 2003
- 1,080
- 42
- 48
- Faith
- Deist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Libertarian
As the title implies, when is it? Obviously blatantly taking somebody's story and claim it is your own is a form of plagiarism.
However, what about when it comes to plotlines for fiction? A good example is the story I have been trying to start for the past few months. (Except that, I have had zero time to do it)
The concept involves the main protagonist being caught in a time loop, and ending up in 1885. (No relation to the Back to the Future movie, but it is to keep in line with historical events in the setting) While here, he discovers evidence of others who were caught in this same loop, and have ended up in different times. It is random, and there is no indication of where a traveler will end up. E.g., you could end up in 1776, or 1 a.d.
The problem I am facing is that fiction is a broad topic. Just about, everything can trace its roots to a starting point. E.g., fantasy tracing back to Tolkien. Science Fiction tracing back to Jules Verne and H.G. Welles.
Some one could say, "Well this story is a rip off of Replay, by Ken Grimwood." Yet the concept of time travel used in that novel, is a rip off H.G. Welles' novel, The Time Machine. This in turn, could be accused of ripping off the time travel concept from Samuel Maddens novel, Memoirs of the Twentieth Century, written in 1733. This is just focusing on the time travel aspect. This does not even touch the dystopian future he leaves, which inevitably, "rips" off other stories.
It seems with lawsuits flying around, attacking authors like Dan Brown and J. K. Rowling, the broad category of science fiction, what is not going to be considered plagiarism?
However, what about when it comes to plotlines for fiction? A good example is the story I have been trying to start for the past few months. (Except that, I have had zero time to do it)
The concept involves the main protagonist being caught in a time loop, and ending up in 1885. (No relation to the Back to the Future movie, but it is to keep in line with historical events in the setting) While here, he discovers evidence of others who were caught in this same loop, and have ended up in different times. It is random, and there is no indication of where a traveler will end up. E.g., you could end up in 1776, or 1 a.d.
The problem I am facing is that fiction is a broad topic. Just about, everything can trace its roots to a starting point. E.g., fantasy tracing back to Tolkien. Science Fiction tracing back to Jules Verne and H.G. Welles.
Some one could say, "Well this story is a rip off of Replay, by Ken Grimwood." Yet the concept of time travel used in that novel, is a rip off H.G. Welles' novel, The Time Machine. This in turn, could be accused of ripping off the time travel concept from Samuel Maddens novel, Memoirs of the Twentieth Century, written in 1733. This is just focusing on the time travel aspect. This does not even touch the dystopian future he leaves, which inevitably, "rips" off other stories.
It seems with lawsuits flying around, attacking authors like Dan Brown and J. K. Rowling, the broad category of science fiction, what is not going to be considered plagiarism?