• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

When did evolution begin?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The creation story in Genesis 1 isn't science and doesn't provide any kind of scientific description for man. So that is a moot point.

There is a very clear fossil record (in addition to genetic studies) that very clearly show human beings are part of a larger lineage of great apes--the hominids, whose closest relatives are the chimps.

So, yes, human beings are animals. Phylogenetically this is easily demonstrated by our clear and demonstrable relation with the other great apes and in bounty of hominid fossils; we aren't plants or fungi, we're animals.

Using Genesis 1 to argue against science is like trying to use Jesus' parable of the shrewd manager to advocate dishonest business practices. That's simply not the point of the story. The point of Genesis 1 isn't to give us a scientific analysis of the created world or to describe the material how of God's creative act but to put forward a theology of creation. Because if you try to take Genesis 1 literally you will immediately come to a major stumbling block when you try reading the creation story in Genesis 2, these are two entirely different stories of creation that, if taken literally, are objectively contradictory. In Genesis 1 God creates vegetation before the beasts and the beasts before man; in Genesis 2 God creates man, then He creates vegetation, and puts man in a garden, and then creates the beasts. In Genesis 1 God creates male and female simultaneously, in Genesis 2 God creates Adam before He creates Eve.

So attempting to use Genesis to reject science simply isn't going to be a useful argument. I don't subscribe to a modern fundamentalist reading of Genesis. Neither, mind you, have many Christians right from the early years of the Christian Church (e.g. Origen, Augustine, and right up through Thomas Aquinas in the high middle ages).

-CryptoLutheran

Do I understand by what you are saying, you do not believe that man is created in God's image?
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Man created God so man obviously made his God look like a man, what better way for man to elevate himself to be more than a mere mortal?
We said we did not want to die so we had to do something about it but what? I know, we will invent a God and believe in that God and tell each other that this wonderful all powerful God will stop us from dying, perfect, the problem of dying has been solved.

And believe it or not the problem of dying has really been solved, it really has because even though we all know it's not really true we have convinced ourselves that it is, and it works, billions of people now do not fear death half as much as they once did, however, having solved the problem of death we have now created other problems with the very monster we created to make death go away, our lives have become ruled by the monster.
Jan how would you like to rather than make broad general brushes of philosophical reasons for religion and why you think people created God rather than the other way around; give us evidence and scientific reasoning which is what this forum is actually meant for?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ben West
Upvote 0

Chicken Little

Well-Known Member
Jun 11, 2010
1,342
288
mid-Americauna
✟3,163.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
What evidence convinces you that man is ape?
yes I'm with you on this one .
Last I checked I can trace to ancestors with two rows of teeth built to chew forever , and probably the even replacing loose teeth. because there is never found any teeth missing in their heads. Now the ones just 1600 years ago or so were head shaping thus putting pressure on the pituitary and simulating man and all creations distant past and for those same reason why all creation was once all
"giants" and not other species or demons either. .
and I can proved to myself my ancestors they had 6 fingers and toes because they were created on the 6th day not the 5th day like beasts of the fields.
Now if there is any properties in common with monkeys it is happening now and since 3 to 4 thousand years ago . because mankind has de - evolved from a 6thday creation to a 5 day creation( or beast of the fields ) and it appears they also have developed a mind of a ape also since 6000 years ago .. and any of those bones they claim as human ancestors are wishful thinking or just a lot of lies and lots putty from men who have lost who they are and were meant to be.

so I'm with you on the fact that man has never been an ape and the closest thing to an ape man has ever been are people now. and any evolution that has been is only DE- evolution and that started about 5555 years ago..
 
Upvote 0

Oncedeceived

Senior Veteran
Jul 11, 2003
21,214
629
✟66,870.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
yes I'm with you on this one .
Last I checked I can trace to ancestors with two rows of teeth built to chew forever , probably the even replacing loose teeth. because there is never found any teeth missing in their heads. Now the ones with just 1600 years ago or so were head shaping thus putting pressure on the pituitary and simulating man and all creations distant past and for those same reason why all creation was once all
"giants" and not other species or demons either. .
and I can proved to myself my ancestors they had 6 fingers and toes because they were created on the 6th day not the 5th day like beasts of the fields.
Now if there is any properties in common with monkeys it is happening now and since 3 to 4 thousand years ago . because mankind has de - evolved from a 6thday creation to a 5 day creation( or beast of the fields ) and it appears they also have developed a mind of a ape also since 6000 years ago .. and any of those bones they claim as human ancestors are wishful thinking or just a lot of lies and lots putty from men who have lost who they are and were meant to be.

so I'm with you on the fact that man has never been an ape and the closest thing to an ape man has ever been are people now. and DE- evolution started about 5555 years ago..
I am not well versed in your position but agreement is always a good start.
 
Upvote 0

Ben West

Active Member
Jun 2, 2015
157
12
51
✟15,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Man created God so man obviously made his God look like a man, what better way for man to elevate himself to be more than a mere mortal?

To be "created" in God's Image is to be created Spiritually in Christ. God is an invisible Spirit and exists in form ONLY in Christ Who IS the Image of the invisible Spirit of God. Col 1:15

This process involves the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Gen 1:26 AND John 14:16 When Adam was "formed" from the dust of the ground, he was NOT created by the Trinity, Spiritually. He was formed by the Hands of Jesus (LORD God) on the 3rd Day Gen 2:4-7 and was "CREATED" Spiritually by the Trinity (God) on the 6th Day. Gen 1:27 and Gen 5:1-2

Like ALL men, Adam was first "formed" and later "created" in Christ by his Faith which is a Gift of God.

1Co 15:46 Howbeit that was not first which is spiritual, but that which is natural; and afterward that which is spiritual.

Amen?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
False. That is what evidence we do have. To use conjecture to determine what could have been before is just that conjecture.

Nothing you have said refutes the facts. All of the evidence we do have is consistent with evolution.

I have claimed that all the evidence that is available to us is of very complex structures which would require complex inner workings. Even if I claimed life has always been complex the evidence supports that conclusion and there is no evidence for anything but the complexity of living forms in evidence.

Your claims require that life be complex from the very start which is just a conjecture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
You DO realize that the men inspired by the Holy Spirit to write the Bible were limited, but God ISN'T, right?

So claims a limited human. Are you perfect? If not, then it would seem that we must reject your claims according to your criteria.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
You certainly are entitled to your opinion. And yes, EVERYONE that is a child of the Most High God is "limited." It is written that in our weakness, God's power is more manifested. For it is clearly HIS power that is evidenced, and not ours.

So claims a limited human. Why should we believe you?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
  • Like
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,102
114,198
✟1,376,072.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
So claims a limited human. Why should we believe you?

Don't. I'm certainly not asking you too. And you are correct, i AM limited.

And so are you.

Why should i believe you?
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Don't. I'm certainly not asking you too. And you are correct, i AM limited.

And so are you.

Why should i believe you?

You shouldn't. You should look at the evidence yourself.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/

That's the thing about evolution. It is based on verifiable evidence that is independent of any human assertions, unlike religion.
 
  • Like
Reactions: muichimotsu
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
249,102
114,198
✟1,376,072.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
Reality is not limited by what you are able to understand or not understand. Also, I have a strange suspicion that you don't want it to make sense.

it never made any sense even when i was a kid......

seriously, it was hard to believe ANYONE would put such credence in evolution....

incredulous.

LOL!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.