What's Up With This Forum? What's It All About? Need clarification...

[notto]

making up stories based on thin air. You will never really know for sure, will you?

Did you ever read that link that Pete provided? Claiming something is based on thin air when in reality (and demonstratably) it is not is not a good debate tactic. You again are using tactics that show the weakness of your arguments.

 

[raphael_aa]

Saklunch- I am in complete agreement with you. You've said what many of us keep thinking, but don't say. I've come to the conclusion that debate on this site is not the way to get our point across.

Hello AutumnAnne

I don't recall seeing many of your posts in this forum. I must have missed them. I'd be happy for you to make any point you feel worth making. Could you explain to me why theistic evolution is not an acceptible position? SackLunch won't answer me.

 

[Numenor]

The reality is that Jesus Christ created you and me, and the entire universe, directly and instaneously.

Except you have no explicit biblical support for that bolded part do you?

 

[Split Rock]

Saklunch- I am in complete agreement with you. You've said what many of us keep thinking, but don't say. I've come to the conclusion that debate on this site is not the way to get our point across.

I guess that depends on what point you are trying to get across to us...

 

[Beastt]

The reality is that Jesus Christ created you and me, and the entire universe, directly and instaneously.

Except you have no explicit biblical support for that bolded part do you?

I would think that he has more biblical support for that, (though still lacking), than for any of the other claims he keeps making on this thread. And he lacks realistic claims for any of it.

 

[Split Rock]

Furthermore, back to my original question. Why are you evolutionists here on a Christian board, chattin' away and getting all out of sorts when God is mentioned? Wouldn't you feel more comfortable on a purely scientific, non-religious board, such as Scientific Forums? That seems more your style. The people there seem more into the heavy science and none of your dreaded PRATT-style "goddidit" stuff.

Maybe you would be happier in the Creationists Only Origins Theology forum. There you won't have to put up with nasty atheists and compromising Christians questioning your interpretation of scripture.

Here I would like to think we are able to freely praise God for His creation, and that's exactly what I will continue to do, despite all your ramblings and complaints that God should be relegated to pseudoscience and fairy tales.

It is your narrow-minded, simplistic, literal interpretation of scripture that we think should be relegated to pseudoscience and fairy tales, not God.

 

[Numenor]

I would think that he has more biblical support for that, (though still lacking), than for any of the other claims he keeps making on this thread. And he lacks realistic claims for any of it.

Well, he has been asked to produce it before and I don't recall him doing so.

 

[Jet Black]

Except you have no explicit biblical support for that bolded part do you?

one might even say that it is a story based on thin air