Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Really, why don't you then give me the evidence that show this design we see in life forms is an illusion?
All known evidence from multiple lines of study and investigation going back billions of years.
Which is still "Darwinian" evolution.
The simple answer would be, It's the creationists nightmare.I want in your own words what you believe evolution is. Can you provide that?
Where's your evidence, based on the scientific method?
It's not the form of Darwinian evolution which makes claims about the creation of humanity (and all life) from an alleged single life form of long long ago.
No it is the evidence. The claim is that this design is an illusion.That is the claim, not the evidence.
No it is the evidence. The claim is that this design is an illusion.
If one wishes to dismiss this evidence they need to provide evidence that shows this design is an illusion.
Right, I am not surprised.The simple answer would be, It's the creationists nightmare.
No, You and others are making that claim.You are claiming that design is an illusion?
No, You and others are making that claim.
The evidence is the design.
What design? Has anyone defined this design or formulated a test to determine when it is present, that is falsifiable?
I will take that to mean that you only accept that evidence that you wish to accept and the fact that nearly all microbiologists and biologist admit to life forms appear to be designed for a purpose.I will if you can first show me that there is design in life forms.
I will take that to mean that you only accept that evidence that you wish to accept and the fact that nearly all microbiologists and biologist admit to life forms appear to be designed for a purpose.
bhsmte, if you can seriously observe the Bacterial Flagellum and the rotary systems as a whole and can deny that they appear designed in the same way as the human designed counterpart except much much more efficient and self error correcting, there is no amount of testing would satisfy your biased materialist point of view.What design? Has anyone defined this design or formulated a test to determine when it is present, that is falsifiable?
Give me one quote that says the appearance is subjective.They admit that there is a subjective appearance of design. Where is the OBJECTIVE evidence?
bhsmte, if you can seriously observe the Bacterial Flagellum and the rotary systems as a whole and can deny that they appear designed . . .
Give me one quote that says the appearance is subjective.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?