Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not even close.I believe those annual checkups at the doctors office just got much easier.
All the doctor has to do is look at you and observe what their eyes tell them. You have the appearance of health, so there is no need to do any blood work, EKG, breast exam, prostate exam, X-rays or any other objective verifiable test, to determine whether this appearance, is indeed reality.
The insurance companies will love this.
Yes it is. The objective evidence shows design with a purpose, the claim is that it is a faulty interpretation of the evidence.That's not objective evidence.
bhsmte is this objective evidence?:Recognition??? That's all it takes, for you to recognize it and it will all magically fall into place.
Does that argument sound familiar?
Yes it is. The objective evidence shows design with a purpose,
the claim is that it is a faulty interpretation of the evidence.
No it isn't. The claim is that the objective apparent design is a faulty interpretation which is produced by evolutionary processes.What objective evidence is that?
The claim is that it is a SUBJECTIVE interpretation.
bhsmte is this objective evidence?:
Yes, these are measurements of what?Here is the objective measurement of cranial size.
Notice the use of numbers and measurements.
Yes, these are measurements of what?
Ok, and how is it determined that they are hominin craniums?Well, he specifically said cranial size, and the Y-axis is labelled cranial capacity, so I am gonna go out on a limb and say it's an objective measurement of the size/capacity of craniums in hominin fossils.
Design does indeed imply a designer, according to Dawkins and others this designer from which this evidence of design is produced is the blind watchmaker. However, he doesn't provide any evidence for that claim. To claim design without any evidence of design in life forms would be perhaps begging the question, however design does immediately imply a designer without begging whatsoever. Patterns and symmetries are not the issue.
What is the issue is the design like factories and machines that we recognize as those designs by intelligent design. Yet, even then, with design apparent enough to recognize and with explanations given to claim it is a faulty interpretation of the evidence; evolution alone being able to produce this evidence is not supported by the evidence that we have. We don't have evolution providing simple to complex before we see this complexity in the first forms of life.
This cloud has the appearance of being a duck without needing to be a duck.
That is what appearances means:
"an impression given by someone or something, although this may be misleading."
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=appearance
How do we determine they share the necessary traits?Because they share the necessary traits of hominin craniums.
Sorry, without patterns and symmetries, you don't have evidence of design.[\quote]. There are patterns symmetries without design, there is more than than that in this.
You can make any excuse you wish of why there isn't any evidence, the point is that there isn't any.If life arrived naturally, and then evolved naturally to the present life forms, the first life forms that were simpler and barely able to reproduce would not have left fossils for us to "see". No shells or bones, you know.
Wouldn't you agree this is an appearance of a duck ?Humans.
How do we know what traits are necessary?By them having the necessary traits.
ExactlyWouldn't you agree this is an appearance of a duck ?
Notice the difference between Loudmouth picture from mine? It's called "details". Living systems looked designed when looking at the details while the evolutionist story telling is very "foggy" when it comes to details. Evolution produces a product of randomness like Loudmouth picture.
It's design
vs random evolution :
I choice intelligent design myself. One thing I learn about fog is it keeps me from seeing clearly.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?