Namaste czach,
thank you for the post.
Anyway, according to the Pali Canons, Buddha never denied the existence of the Creator. You should take time to read my previous posts, and then make your analysis.
Peace.
whilst this seems to be correct it actually is not.
(pasted from another post i've done on this topic)
Many modern commentators think that the reason the Buddha taught as he did was due to a lack of understanding of monotheism. they often have the, incorrect view, that the Sanatana Dharma is a polytheistic tradition when in actuality it is not. it is, in fact, monotheistic with a very interesting permutation. Muller has termed this "Henotheism" which means, essentially, that there is one God but that aspects of this being are manifest and given their own due, like Mercy, and Compassion et al.
the term "creator god" is rendered as
issara-nimmana-vada Pali and it is this which we are discussing. a belief in a Creator deity is classified as a "wong view" of a morally destructive kind since they deny the consequences of karma and presume certain other wrong views, such as the existence of Atman and so forth.
the Buddha Shakyamuni explained the lack of a Creator Deity in many ways..along with the idea that Nibbana/Nirvana is not permenent either. these are both examples of "clinging to views" which directly impedes ones progress along the path.
here is a Sutta where the Buddha repudiates the prevailing Samhkya philosophical tradition of the time..
http://www.accesstoinsight.org/tipit....001.than.html
in the Digha Nikaya (the Long Discourses) 24 it is said like this:
"There are some ascetics and brahmins who declare as their doctrine
that all things began with the creation by a god, or Brahma."
And this god is characterized so:
"That Worshipful Brahma, the Great God, the Omnipotent, the
Omniscient, the Organizer, the Protection, the Creator, the Most
Perfect Ruler, the Designer and Orderer, the Father of All That Have Been and Shall Be, He by Whom we were created, He is permanent, Constant,
Eternal, Unchanging, and He will remain so for ever and ever."
"There is none other God but Thee, the Almighty, the Most Exalted,
the All-Powerful, the All-Wise".
*The notion of creator is rejected in terms of the Buddha in satirically retelling the creation story of the Brhadaranyaka Upanishad. This not "a discreet silence about the First Cause," it is not indifference. Though the Buddha's particular rejection is not a philosophical argument against a creator god, per se, it is rather a religious statement that is consistent with the underlying ontology of becoming that characterizes what the Buddha taught. What is clear, in the broader context, is that this rejection is not tied to a particular god-notion, but addresses the notion of a "single supernatural Being" from which "all things began," given that such a notion is invariably grounded in a radically different ontological basis than what the Buddha presents.
(*indebted to Bruce Burrill)
metta,
~v