What's up with your font?
Do you not like it? It's called Palatino, nice looking, wouldn't you say?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What's up with your font?
It is wise to leave the intentions of the heart to God.
Do you not like it? It's called Palatino, nice looking, wouldn't you say?
Ok so we should believe Luke 13? Good to know.
What good will believing Luke 13 do, if you do not obey what it says?
If it doesn't change, I won't bother reading your responses. Not worth the effort.
It is wise to leave the intentions of the heart to God.
Cant...quite...read....
Dang, now I have a headache.
Do you not like it? It's called Palatino, nice looking, wouldn't you say?
There's nothing wrong with the font itself.
But you made the size too small. I can barely read it. It's like 2 pixels high on my screen.
You don't know the answer to your own question. Probably the answer is neither. God did not murder Jesus and did not get lucky Jesus was murdered.When God sent Christ to die for our sins to save us, did He guarantee that Christ would be murdered to accomplish this plan?
Or did God (and by extension, us) just get lucky that some people happened to decide to murder Jesus?
No logic anywhere in that.Ok, well I said your signature was unbiblical, and you said "Only if you pick and choose and reject parts of the Bible." so per your own admission, since you pick and choose and reject parts of the Bible, you must believe your signature was unbiblical. Logic.
You don't know the answer to your own question. Probably the answer is neither. God did not murder Jesus and did not get lucky Jesus was murdered.
You are accusing Peter of having added a requirement. Do you also accuse Jesus of adding a requirement when He said repent or perish?=Jesusfreak5000;61968987]That's fine, but you have now removed the graciousness of the Gospel and added a requirement to it. It is a gracious gift, there is no merit or demerit, working or non-working in the reception.
Then who is he saying is the cause of sin?You said you don't agree with Edwards if he is saying God is the cause of the sin. And I responded "then you must agree with him" - meaning he is not saying God is the cause of sin. I think you missed that.
I agree sin was no surprise to God. I do not agree God is evil, which God would be if the responsibility for sin was on God. God allowed man to sin. God did not decide for man to sin and make it happen. I do not recognize the omniscience of Edwards. I do recognize the logic of Edward's quote placing the blame for all sin on God.However the ordination of God certainly does make all existence actual; nothing happens that was not ordained or decreed. This does not make God the direct cause of sin, however, it does mean He decided it would certainly happen.
You must recognize the logic of Edward's quote. Otherwise you deny omniscience.
Was David innocent of murder simply because he did not personally do it, but guaranteed by order that the husband of Bathsheba would be murdered by other people? God is able to work out good from man's evil, but it is not God's evil when God does that.I didn't ask if God murdered Jesus
I asked if God guaranteed by divine decree and purpose that Christ would be murdered by other people.
So was Christ's death and our resulting salvation an accident (God got lucky?) or was it God's plan that could not possibly fail?
Which is it elman?
Was David innocent of murder simply because he did not personally do it, but guaranteed by order that the husband of Bathsheba would be murdered by other people? God is able to work out good from man's evil, but it is not God's evil when God does that.
You refuse to answer the question because the obvious answer shoots holes in your theology, I'm afraid.
it's the big elephant in the room of Elmanism. Can't ignore it forever though.
You ignored my question which was exactly on point, because it points out the error of your statement.
I agree sin was no surprise to God. I do not agree God is evil, which God would be if the responsibility for sin was on God. God allowed man to sin. God did not decide for man to sin and make it happen. I do not recognize the omniscience of Edwards. I do recognize the logic of Edward's quote placing the blame for all sin on God.