Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
What's more important, truth or the Bible?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="skepticlogician" data-source="post: 67369941" data-attributes="member: 259929"><p>Why does it have to be "everything" not true? Did I say anything along those lines?</p><p>I'm perfectly fine acknowledging that the Bible contains many truths. But over the years I've found that it also contains quite a few errors and contradictions.</p><p></p><p> </p><p>Completely agree...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Completely agree as well.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Hmm... Interestingly enough, I would agree that it's very possible that a man called Jesus' existed, preached an apocalyptic message and got into deep trouble with authorities which eventually led to his execution.</p><p></p><p>However, the fact that he may have existed does not automatically promote to truths the claim of his divinity nor any of the miraculous events that are claimed to have happened around him. Otherwise, you would have to accept as factual any writing or book that contains mythical or supernatural stories as long as these stories refer to, mention or are about people that actually existed.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Not sure I follow, can you give me an example?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="skepticlogician, post: 67369941, member: 259929"] Why does it have to be "everything" not true? Did I say anything along those lines? I'm perfectly fine acknowledging that the Bible contains many truths. But over the years I've found that it also contains quite a few errors and contradictions. Completely agree... Completely agree as well. Hmm... Interestingly enough, I would agree that it's very possible that a man called Jesus' existed, preached an apocalyptic message and got into deep trouble with authorities which eventually led to his execution. However, the fact that he may have existed does not automatically promote to truths the claim of his divinity nor any of the miraculous events that are claimed to have happened around him. Otherwise, you would have to accept as factual any writing or book that contains mythical or supernatural stories as long as these stories refer to, mention or are about people that actually existed. Not sure I follow, can you give me an example? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
What's more important, truth or the Bible?
Top
Bottom