• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What's enough evidence?

RightWingGirl

Well-Known Member
May 12, 2004
971
28
36
America
✟23,794.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
A very interesting question....I think that I would begin to consider Evolution if intelligent man could create what random chance and natural selection are supposed to be created. If man could create a living, breathing animal from only primordial slime.
 
Upvote 0

Nightson

Take two snuggles and call me in the morning
Jul 11, 2005
4,470
235
California
✟5,839.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
RightWingGirl said:
A very interesting question....I think that I would begin to consider Evolution if intelligent man could create what random chance and natural selection are supposed to be created. If man could create a living, breathing animal from only primordial slime.

o_O don't you think that's a bit of a high standard?

But to address that, I don't think that woukld be very convincing evidence for me, evolution says that billions of years, combined with mutation and natural selection produced an animal, but science accomplishing such a feat would use none of those. It'd be an amazing discovery and wonderful technology, but I don't think it would make good evidence for evolution. In addition, it seems odd to base your acceptance of a possible natural law on human inventiveness.

Can you think of any evidence that might make you consider evolution that could (theoretically) be present now?
 
Upvote 0

michabo

reason, evidence
Nov 11, 2003
11,355
493
50
Vancouver, BC
Visit site
✟14,055.00
Faith
Atheist
RightWingGirl said:
A very interesting question....I think that I would begin to consider Evolution if intelligent man could create what random chance and natural selection are supposed to be created. If man could create a living, breathing animal from only primordial slime.
Given a few billion years, you mean.

That does make your requirement a bit laughable.

If we managed to create life in the lab, what will that prove? It just proves that we can create life, but says nothing about how life actually arose in the past. And if we can do it in our lifetimes in a lab, it will definately not be how life arose in the past.
 
Upvote 0

Elduran

Disruptive influence
May 19, 2005
1,773
64
43
✟24,830.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
RightWingGirl said:
A very interesting question....I think that I would begin to consider Evolution if intelligent man could create what random chance and natural selection are supposed to be created. If man could create a living, breathing animal from only primordial slime.

I'm willing to bet that if that ever happened you would be one of the first to say "see, it took intelligence to do that" and shift the goalposts even further.
 
Upvote 0

Tomk80

Titleless
Apr 27, 2004
11,570
429
45
Maastricht
Visit site
✟36,582.00
Faith
Agnostic
RightWingGirl said:
A very interesting question....I think that I would begin to consider Evolution if intelligent man could create what random chance and natural selection are supposed to be created. If man could create a living, breathing animal from only primordial slime.
But we already use evolution in computerprograms to do the programming for us if the task becomes too difficult for us to solve (genetic algorithms). So why would you think that we would actually be able to do what evolution/abiogenesis have done.
 
Upvote 0