What you aren't being told about astronomy

[RickG]

Evolution does not work. What possibility is left?

You made a claim about a specific scientific paper. If you can't provide a citation and discussion of its content and context, then my only presumption left is that you must have made the claim up. And and I previously stated, even if the two bones were unrelated it does not invalidate ToE in the least. You still have not provide scientific evidence for things popping into existence in the fossil record.

 

[juvenissun]

Then what makes you think that you are qualified enough to say that evolution is wrong?

My training and experience on science.

 

[juvenissun]

Then why say it if you're not going to give the evidence then? Are you just doing it so you can get attention?

What I can do it to defeat your evidence.

 

[juvenissun]

You made a claim about a specific scientific paper. If you can't provide a citation and discussion of its content and context, then my only presumption left is that you must have made the claim up. And and I previously stated, even if the two bones were unrelated it does not invalidate ToE in the least. You still have not provide scientific evidence for things popping into existence in the fossil record.

No I did not.

 

[juvenissun]

You made a claim about a specific scientific paper. If you can't provide a citation and discussion of its content and context, then my only presumption left is that you must have made the claim up. And and I previously stated, even if the two bones were unrelated it does not invalidate ToE in the least. You still have not provide scientific evidence for things popping into existence in the fossil record.

Then one can not claim that it support ToE.

 

[durangodawood]

My training and experience on science.

I've seen this before: guy who's expert in field X thinks that gives him the skills to demolish all the experts in field Y.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

My training and experience on science.

Yeah. Apart from the fact that, over the few years that I've seen you on this forum, you have actually yet to demonstrate that you have any training and experience in science.
Again: the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

What I can do it to defeat your evidence.

Except, you know, actually present scientific evidence and have actual scientific knowledge.

 

[RickG]

Then one can not claim that it support ToE.

I don't know if it does or does not. You made the claim that it did not but you won't provide a citation for the paper of a description why you feel it does not.

 

[RickG]

No I did not.

Yes you did. Post 299.

For example, a paper showed two similar bones, and said one evolved into another.
What kind of evidence is that? It is not scientific at all.

What paper? Furthermore, the way you state it is not what evolution describes. Populations evolve, not individuals.

 

[juvenissun]

I've seen this before: guy who's expert in field X thinks that gives him the skills to demolish all the experts in field Y.

It is very possible. In fact, it is encouraged to do so.

 

[juvenissun]

Yeah. Apart from the fact that, over the few years that I've seen you on this forum, you have actually yet to demonstrate that you have any training and experience in science.
Again: the Dunning-Kruger effect in action.

Very simple. Try me.

 

[juvenissun]

Yes you did. Post 299.



What paper? Furthermore, the way you state it is not what evolution describes. Populations evolve, not individuals.

A bunch of them. It is a type of study.
Right. But people use individual case to generalize into a population character . That is very common way people drew conclusions.

 

[juvenissun]

Yes you did. Post 299.

No I did not specify any.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Very simple. Try me.

I don't have to. Your posts in this thread, your refusal to show evidence when asked, show that you are just blustering and posturing. Nothing more, nothing less.

 

[juvenissun]

I don't have to. Your posts in this thread, your refusal to show evidence when asked, show that you are just blustering and posturing. Nothing more, nothing less.

So you don't.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

No I did not specify any.

Yes, you did. You said:

For example, a paper showed two similar bones, and said one evolved into another.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

So you don't.

I've done more than you have in this thread. At least I'm not pretending that I'm someone's intellectual superior by saying that I'm 'teaching' them, when in actuality what I'd be doing would get me fired from any self-respecting school.

 

[juvenissun]

Yes, you did. You said:

I did not specify any particular one.

 

[juvenissun]

I've done more than you have in this thread. At least I'm not pretending that I'm someone's intellectual superior by saying that I'm 'teaching' them, when in actuality what I'd be doing would get me fired from any self-respecting school.

In this forum, I never pretend. I don't have to.
If you know something I do not know, I will beg you to tell me.

Show me something you know, but I may not. There has to be something like that.