What you aren't being told about astronomy

juvenissun · Jan 14, 2016

Warden_of_the_Storm said:
We have! We have repeatedly asked what evidence proves evolution wrong. And you have not answered that question.

You are you. They are they. It is different.

Warden_of_the_Storm · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
You are you. They are they. It is different.

JUST ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTION!

juvenissun · Jan 14, 2016

Warden_of_the_Storm said:
JUST ANSWER THE FREAKING QUESTION!

This is why I really don't like to talk to you. Why should I answer your question with that attitude?

Warden_of_the_Storm · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
This is why I really don't like to talk to you. Why should I answer your question with that attitude?

I have an attitude because you have been asked this question many times, but have refused to answer it and have acted like everyone else is wrong when you have shown nothing but a haughty and arrogant attitude to everyone else.

Larniavc · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
Do you want to find out? Ask a question which you do not know the answer.

I know you are not a teacher because you have no academic qualities required to teach: along with any basic knowledge in the subjects you pontificate on.

Everyone on this forum knows your game: assert and refuse to substantiate.

juvenissun · Jan 14, 2016

Warden_of_the_Storm said:
I have an attitude because you have been asked this question many times, but have refused to answer it and have acted like everyone else is wrong when you have shown nothing but a haughty and arrogant attitude to everyone else.

You should not have that attitude.

juvenissun · Jan 14, 2016

Larnievc said:
I know you are not a teacher because you have no academic qualities required to teach: along with any basic knowledge in the subjects you pontificate on.

Everyone on this forum knows your game: assert and refuse to substantiate.

Should I report you on this one? Do you care?

Warden_of_the_Storm · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
You should not have that attitude.

I can have this attitude if I want. You can't tell me what to do.

AV1611VET · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
Should I report you on this one? Do you care?

Hey, bro.

Is it really worth it?

I wouldn't bother admin about it.

Let your credentials stand on their own merit and fight your own battles.

Believe me -- I'm speaking from experience here!

Warden_of_the_Storm · Jan 14, 2016

AV1611VET said:
Hey, bro.

Is it really worth it?

I wouldn't bother admin about it.

Let your credentials stand on their own merit and fight your own battles.

Believe me -- I'm speaking from experience here!

I was going to reply about my view on juvenissm and his possible credentials, but I think that would make this thread go down a very different slope.

Larniavc · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
Should I report you on this one? Do you care?

Report me. Everything I have said is reasonable and a fair reading of this thread will show how disingenuous you have been in this debate.

Good day, sir.

Hammster · Jan 14, 2016

MOD HAT ON

MOD HAT OFF

juvenissun · Jan 14, 2016

AV1611VET said:
Hey, bro.

Is it really worth it?

I wouldn't bother admin about it.

Let your credentials stand on their own merit and fight your own battles.

Believe me -- I'm speaking from experience here!

OK. Thanks.

DogmaHunter · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
In science and logic, I don't see any possibility for a monkey changed into a human.

Perhaps that rather says something about your (lack of) proficiency in both science and logic.

Most of us understand that if you keep adding inches together, you end up with lightyears.

TLK Valentine · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
You are you. They are they. It is different.

Alas, you are still you.

DogmaHunter · Jan 14, 2016

juvenissun said:
But, I still want to claim it, until it is proven false.
Because it is important for me to argue against evolution.

I wonder if one could be more blatant then this.

Literally saying that one holds on desperatly to an unsupported assumption and a fallacious shifting of the burden of proof, in order to hold on to a faith based belief system.

Ow my.

So I guess the discussion is over then. To continue would be futile.

Hoghead1 · Jan 14, 2016

If I were you guys, I would simply ignore Juvinessun. He does not belong in a serious theological discussion and so you are just wasting your time on him. Let's get on with the show and dialogue with people who really know how to dialogue here.

RickG · Jan 14, 2016

DogmaHunter said:
Perhaps that rather says something about your (lack of) proficiency in both science and logic.

Most of us understand that if you keep adding inches together, you end up with lightyears.

Where the monkey to human mentality is inch to inch ignoring each previous inch instead of the overall distance.

AV1611VET · Jan 14, 2016

Hoghead1 said:
If I were you guys, I would simply ignore Juvinessun. He does not belong in a serious theological discussion and so you are just wasting your time on him. Let's get on with the show and dialogue with people who really know how to dialogue here.

Perhaps you don't understand his theological position?

QV please: Sacred Geology[URL="http://"][/url]

Justatruthseeker · Jan 14, 2016

Warden_of_the_Storm said:
That is a flat out lie. I have asked you, at least twice, to show how evolution is wrong, using the fossil record as an example. And the only thing you have done is say "creation explains it" and left it at that.

The classification of the fossil record is in error.

All you have ever observed is Asian mates with Asian and produces only Asian. African mates with African and produces only African. Only when Asian mates with African do you observe variation (Afro-Asian) in the record.

All you have ever observed is Husky mates with Husky and produces only Husky. Mastiff mates with Mastiff and produces only Mastiff. Only when Husky mates with Mastiff do you observe variation (Chinook) in the record.

The Asian remained Asian, the African remained African, the Husky remained Husky, the Mastiff remained Mastiff. None of them evolved into anything and no links were missing. Just as the T-Rex remained T-Rex, the Triceratops remained Triceratops, etc, etc......

If you had never observed a dog in life but only had fossils of them, you would insist the Husky or Mastiff evolved into the Chinook simply because the Chinook appeared at a later time in the record. And would be wrong.

These:

Are no different than these:

Just different infra-specific taxa in the species to which each belongs.

They can't even get babies and adults classified correctly.

When you classify the fossil record according to what we observe in real life - instead of ignoring it - let me know.

What you aren't being told about astronomy

... and God saw that it was good.

Well-Known Member

... and God saw that it was good.

Well-Known Member

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."

... and God saw that it was good.

... and God saw that it was good.

Well-Known Member

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Well-Known Member

"Encourage him to keep talking. He's hilarious."

Carpe Chaos

... and God saw that it was good.

Code Monkey

I've already read the books you want burned.

Code Monkey

Well-Known Member

Senior Veteran

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE

Newbie

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency