• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What would you lose if Christianity were not true?

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat

Why would you assume that I already accept these things? I am actually a pretty committed anti-materialist, which means that the existence of physical reality is one of the things I'm less certain of. I dance between Plato and Aristotle.

This is an underlying problem here. You assume that theists share the same axioms that you do and then add on additional ones. For some this is true, but not for all of us. My starting point is Necessary Existence and the Neoplatonic One, not the physical universe, which could very well just be the fever dream of a dying Hindu god.

Also, the sky is not blue. That's the refraction of light as captured by our eyes.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Thank you, Silmarien. Having your opponent admit that they aren't certain the world is real is always useful in a debate. You're doing a fine job of making your opinion irrelevant by admitting that nothing you say needs be taken seriously.

Also, the sky is not blue. That's the refraction of light as captured by our eyes.
Or is it? How can we be sure of anything, eh?
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,160
3,179
Oregon
✟941,514.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Thank you, Silmarien. Having your opponent admit that they aren't certain the world is real is always useful in a debate.
The Mystics tend to say that Reality is only relatively real. The Indigenous people say that Nature and Reality around us is a Verb. The Sufies, who are Mystics, talk about the world we see around us as being an illusion. Quantum Theory tells us that Reality is both a wave and particle. Or in others words, what you make it. I'm of the spiritual trajectory where the ONLY Reality is God. Some would call that as being Hard Panentheist.

You're doing a fine job of making your opinion irrelevant by admitting that nothing you say needs be taken seriously.
Even in disagreement, I've always taken what Silmarien says with respect. Maybe trying to listen with different ears would give a fuller depth of understanding?

Or is it? How can we be sure of anything, eh?
The one thing I am Sure of is Love. It's almost like we Human Beings, more than any other critters walking the Earth are made to respond to Love. But at the same time we're unable to put our finger on what Love is. Love is a Reality we can sink into, even get lost in. Poets talk about Love. Singers sing about Love. But it's not physical reality. Yet Love as a non-physical reality touches each of us in one way or another.
 
Reactions: Silmarien
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟133,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why don't you define what you mean? What is 'soul'?
I'm leaving that up to you. You can use the dictionary, you can define it the way you did in the past, or perhaps you have your own definition you wish to use.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BigV

Junior Member
Dec 27, 2007
1,093
267
48
USA, IL
✟49,404.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'm leaving that up to you. You can use the dictionary, you can define it the way you did in the past, or, assuming you wish to say you have one, you can tell me what that means.

I think the bodily existence is what we have. Once we die, it's lights out forever. There is no evidence for anything else.

Evidence for bodily existence only includes anesthesia, when your 'soul' is doing the same thing your body is doing (i.e bing unconscious). Death, in my view, is the eternal unconsciousness.
 
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟133,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think the bodily existence is what we have. Once we die, it's lights out forever. There is no evidence for anything else.
The last part above is not even close to true, but I want to focus on the first. I saw you change after you rejected Jesus. You were a kind and loving person, and that is gone. As you would have defined it, you have lost your soul, twice over. Yet one can read your history and witness something perish that is not your body.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,160
3,179
Oregon
✟941,514.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
I think the bodily existence is what we have. Once we die, it's lights out forever. There is no evidence for anything else.
I used to believe the same. Than my first child was born and everything changed for me. It's when I first saw that baby smile and eyes lit up upon recognition of her mother that made me realize there is something much, much more going on inside of us than mere body existence.
 
Reactions: NBB and Sanoy
Upvote 0

Silmarien

Existentialist
Feb 24, 2017
4,337
5,254
39
New York
✟223,224.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Thank you, Silmarien. Having your opponent admit that they aren't certain the world is real is always useful in a debate. You're doing a fine job of making your opinion irrelevant by admitting that nothing you say needs be taken seriously.

Oh, I don't know. In my experience, Spinoza, Leibniz, Kant, and Hegel are taken pretty seriously. Some of the stuff being bandied about by physicists is wilder than anything I've said, but I guess they're irrelevant too.
 
Reactions: Halbhh
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
That sounds like an attempt to guilt someone.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 4, 2006
3,868
1,065
.
✟102,547.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
(shrug) With respect, so what?

Even in disagreement, I've always taken what Silmarien says with respect. Maybe trying to listen with different ears would give a fuller depth of understanding?
I have too. Silmarien and I have had some very long and interesting discussions in the past, and I've always respected her as a worthy opponent. But things have gone too far this time, and I think it's best we don't speak again.

Interesting.
First, what do you mean when you say "the only thing you are sure of is love? Do you mean it is the only thing you can be certain is real? Or do you mean it is the only thing you can rely on? Or do you mean it is the only thing that gives life meaning? I don't mean to quibble, but the word "sure" can mean different things in different contexts.
Second, love is not a physical reality? In fact, it is. Love is the effect of chemicals in the brain. I don't mean to cheapen or debase it. There is a lot we don't understand about love, and hope, and sadness, and despair. But there is no evidence that love has any kind of existence independent of the people feeling it.
 
Upvote 0

holo

former Christian
Dec 24, 2003
8,992
751
✟85,294.00
Country
Norway
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Remember that atheism doesn't mean anything other than not believing in God. Sure, it's possible to just remove all traces of Christianity from your life. But it's also possible (and I guess inevitable) to replace some of the things you lose when you lose faith. Personally, I was especially surprised to find so much meaning and hope after I lost faith, though it took me several years of horrible agnosticism before I came out on the other side of faith, so to speak.

Another thing that struck me, looking back on my faith and deconversion, was that it felt at the time as if I were losing God. God was there, helping me out, and then he left. But it dawned on me that he was never there to begin with. So all the good things I had as a believer, I didn't have because God was there, but in spite of him not being there. It was an illusion, but a powerful and helpful one. My faith caused me quite a lot of trouble, but it was also a... well, salvation in many ways. I was both terrified (at first) and then relieved (later) to see God disappear. In a way I was fooled - I used to believe that faith in God was the only possible way to have real peace. I don't mind if people believe, but I think it's a shame if they hold on to faith because they're scared of God not being there after all.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Feel'n the Burn of Philosophy!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,915
11,662
Space Mountain!
✟1,376,591.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

And I and Pascal would say that you "have a problem" then, holo.
 
Upvote 0

Sanoy

Well-Known Member
Apr 27, 2017
3,169
1,421
America
✟133,024.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So all the good things I had as a believer, I didn't have because God was there, but in spite of him not being there. It was an illusion, but a powerful and helpful one.
If God does not exist I agree, and that is what I tried to convey when I spoke about delusion. The illusion you speak of never ended, it just changed chapters. This new chapter may matter to you, but it is not different in nature from the previous chapter. All of that book, which we may call your mental state, is merely the product of the indifference of evolution. We are all the slaves of our intuitions which toss our thoughts and beliefs like a cork floating along the ocean. You merely described a change in scenery, rather than anything fundamentally different.
 
Upvote 0