Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is an oncoming train.
I don't know about that. I think it depends upon ones perspective of God. If one were to experience God as the Life Force of everything, I think that changes your given perspective of what perfection and holiness is. But I do agree with you that many religions pretty much do fit your description.Seriously though, wouldn't you agree that "perfection" and "holiness" in many religions can be symbolized by an infinitely tall ice cream cone that never melts and doesn't make you fat? We have a world where animals have teeth and claws and eat each other, but we imagine a God that just wants to feed us ice cream.
I don't know about that. I think it depends upon ones perspective of God. If one were to experience God as the Life Force of everything, I think that changes your given perspective of what perfection and holiness is. But I do agree with you that many religions pretty much do fit your description.
@cloudyday2I went through the same thing going through the church. I started to get very skeptical, not of God, but of the Bible. I'd ask tough questions and get the same garbage answers from everyone one as if they all rehearsed the same answers. I decided I'd leave the church and see if I could live without it. I did for a while. I wish I could say that I had an epiphany that sorted out my skepticism but I didn't. I had a dark night of the soul that nearly left me dead. And there was this voice that shook me, saying "endure", "endure"..."endure". He gave me the strength to go home, and every night I would suffer tremendously. I told my mom to pray for me and she did. I knew every night when she forgot to pray for me because the torment would start again.
Skepticism is very easy, and answers are very hard. So after I recovered I started studying the ANE, philosophy, and Biblical scholarship to handle my own skeptical questions and to be a person in the world that will not cause what happened to me, and probably you as well in the church. You never know when Gods going to meet me you, even when He seems so distant and blocked by obstacles.
Nothing is more convincing to me than my personal experience of the presence of God in my life.
I would like to see some sort of study of the types of experiences and their frequencies by region and religion. There are probably some differences in religions, but like you suggest there are probably a lot more similarities. The differences are probably going to vary more by culture than by religion, although culture and religion are usually linked.The question then is.
When the same convincing experiences are had by people that have God in their lives, who are called Zoroastrian, or Hindu, or Muslim, or Baha'i, are you convinced they also have a genuine God expeience, just as you have?
Regards Tony
I have seen some of those things too, and that is why I tried my best to be a Christian for a few years. I was highly confused and suspicious, but I thought I had some evidence that Christianity was true. Ultimately the problems I saw in Christian theology outweighed the evidence. Later I learned about psychosis and other frailties in the human mind, and I have gradually accepted that explanation.I have seen angels, ghosts, been attacked by demons, and miraculously healed. Nothing is more convincing to me than my personal experience of the presence of God in my life.
This type of experience is probably the most important for maintaining the faith that you might have originally gained through some exciting moment-in-time type of event. Steady progress over the long term keeps people believing I suspect.And He stays with you, testifying to your heart and changing you from the inside.
I have seen some of those things too, and that is why I tried my best to be a Christian for a few years. I was highly confused and suspicious, but I thought I had some evidence that Christianity was true. Ultimately the problems I saw in Christian theology outweighed the evidence. Later I learned about psychosis and other frailties in the human mind, and I have gradually accepted that explanation.
I know right. You would think that these things would be enough. You hear these uberskeptics on the forums say "if I only saw God", but then you know what doubt can do. You know what their doubt would do, they would just call it hallucination and demand more. If only they would look inward rather than outward because that is so much stronger. That is where you meet people and begin to know them. You never actually meet them empirically because they are minds, you apprehend them in your personal space. There is something called the principle of credulity. It states that we should believe an experience unless we have a reason not too because if we don't we lose everything in a cascade of doubt. Hallucination really isn't an explanation, it's merely a statement that it didn't actually happen. It doesn't actually explain what happened. Our entire experience of the world is a phenomenon in our head. The world is colorless and meaningless to the groping hands of scientific instruments. If God exists I think He would provide a means for us to perceive spiritual things in a physical way we can comprehend. And it may be that this system is broken in some patients, and it may be abused in LSD users, and it may be perfectly fit in those who are neither broken in mind or abusive of LSD.I have seen some of those things too, and that is why I tried my best to be a Christian for a few years. I was highly confused and suspicious, but I thought I had some evidence that Christianity was true. Ultimately the problems I saw in Christian theology outweighed the evidence. Later I learned about psychosis and other frailties in the human mind, and I have gradually accepted that explanation.
I think that God's nature is perceivable by all even without scripture. I think anyone can come to know God by His nature, and build a religion upon that experience or identify His perceived nature through the properties of God's nature incorporated in other religions. The Ugaritic hero, Danel of Ezekiel 14:14 is one such person. Those religions are not themselves paths to anything, whatever good they accomplish they accomplish through the characteristics of God that they have incorporated. This is what Paul reveals in Romans 2:14-16The question then is.
When the same convincing experiences are had by people that have God in their lives, who are called Zoroastrian, or Hindu, or Muslim, or Baha'i, are you convinced they also have a genuine God experience, just as you have?
Regards Tony
And that is the key issue I realized that motivated me to start this thread. From about age 20 to 45 I was looking for some sort of personal experience to make me certain enough to be serious about Christianity. Then I thought I had some personal experiences, but after a couple of years I lost faith again. Currently I'm not looking for a personal experience. Believing in orthodox Christianity is like believing in Santa's workshop at the North Pole. It doesn't matter if I see Santa Claus on Christmas Eve, because I know there are no flying reindeer and elves hiding at the North Pole. I suppose anything is theoretically possible, but some things are so far-out that I can't take them seriously. That is how I feel about Christianity now. ... On the other hand, I sometimes wonder if there was something besides psychosis involved in my experiences. That is why I label myself a "generic theist". I think there is a small chance that God might have used Christian symbols such as Jesus to prod me for unknown reasons. ... Other times I think it is more likely that the atheists are correct.I know right. You would think that these things would be enough. You hear these uberskeptics on the forums say "if I only saw God", but then you know what doubt can do. You know what their doubt would do, they would just call it hallucination and demand more. If only they would look inward rather than outward because that is so much stronger. That is where you meet people and begin to know them. You never actually meet them empirically because they are minds, you apprehend them in your personal space. There is something called the principle of credulity. It states that we should believe an experience unless we have a reason not too because if we don't we lose everything in a cascade of doubt. Hallucination really isn't an explanation, it's merely a statement that it didn't actually happen. It doesn't actually explain what happened. Our entire experience of the world is a phenomenon in our head. The world is colorless and meaningless to the groping hands of scientific instruments. If God exists I think He would provide a means for us to perceive spiritual things in a physical way we can comprehend. And it may be that this system is broken in some patients, and it may be abused in LSD users, and it may be perfectly fit in those who are neither broken in mind or abusive of LSD.
And that is the key issue I realized that motivated me to start this thread. From about age 20 to 45 I was looking for some sort of personal experience to make me certain enough to be serious about Christianity. Then I thought I had some personal experiences, but after a couple of years I lost faith again. Currently I'm not looking for a personal experience. Believing in orthodox Christianity is like believing in Santa's workshop at the North Pole. It doesn't matter if I see Santa Claus on Christmas Eve, because I know there are no flying reindeer and elves hiding at the North Pole. I suppose anything is theoretically possible, but some things are so far-out that I can't take them seriously. That is how I feel about Christianity now. ... On the other hand, I sometimes wonder if there was something besides psychosis involved in my experiences. That is why I label myself a "generic theist". I think there is a small chance that God might have used Christian symbols such as Jesus to prod me for unknown reasons. ... Other times I think it is more likely that the atheists are correct.
I preferred my original state of uncertainty about Christianity, because it allowed me to truly respect Christians even though I was skeptical. Now I can respect Christians for everything EXCEPT their religious beliefs. I can only pity and empathize with them for believing things that I can't take seriously now. I would rather be respectfully skeptical of Christianity, but I can't go back.
My main motivation is to understand my own experiences. I have a variety of hypotheses:It seems like the next course is to try to attach properties to generic God that can help you identify him. Starting with our epistemic foundation is a good start, because without it we can't know anything.
Abduction might be helpful when it's hard to eliminate one of the options. That would be to chose which one best explains the experience or belief. So if I have the experience that I can acquire facts about the world then I should select the property that would best explain that ability in a way that reduces doubt. For example if I select the property that generic god doesn't care about me, then that would cast doubt upon my intellectual faculties. So the best explanation for my intellectual faculties will be one in which generic god has the property of caring about us. Choosing the property that generic god doesn't care about us undermines our faculties, which then undermines the selection and the very pursuit of truth itself.I suppose any set of properties for a generic God is just a wild guess, because the data can be explained in so many ways. Here are some ideas:
- a generic God doesn't care about the specifics of our beliefs (otherwise he wouldn't allow us to be so confused)
- a generic God seems to become personally involved (otherwise we wouldn't have personal experiences of it)
- a generic God seems to love us, but for some reason he can't or won't make the world "good". Maybe our idea of "good" and "evil" is wrong.
That's a start.
Some people I suspect are open if they found some reasons to believe (evidence), and other people have reasons to disbelieve that would trump any evidence.
I wasn't imagining an irrevocable conversion or change, but I suppose that is what some Christians claim when they say "once saved always saved".Would this be the same as converting to Christianity?
In which case it would mean "change".
"What would it take to make you change?"
If there is no turning back?
Something like Vikings when invading,
burning their ships so there was no way of retreat.
I wasn't imagining an irrevocable conversion or change, but I suppose that is what some Christians claim when they say "once saved always saved".
Those religions are not themselves paths to anything, whatever good they accomplish they accomplish through the characteristics of God
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?