- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,856,256
- 52,668
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Sure ... just build a time machine and go back to BC 4004 and have at it.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sure ... just build a time machine and go back to BC 4004 and have at it.Why do you need for Jesus to come back and falsify "evolutionism?" If its wrong, shouldn't we be able to falsify it without him?
I can imagine Theistic Evolutionists getting a ride back in time ... compliments of the One reigning on the throne during the Millennial Reign ... and actually seeing God speak the universe into existence; and hanging their heads in shame at all the time they wasted because they thought it went down differently.
Split Rock said:Why do you need for Jesus to come back and falsify "evolutionism?" If its wrong, shouldn't we be able to falsify it without him?
To a point.Evolution: all the facts are on our side.
Just as you expect one to accept the Bible in its entirety then should you accept science in its entirety. You cannot pick and choose what you like and discard what you don't like in both!It's really quite simple.
Where miracles are involved, science must stand down and allow it to happen.
If science never took a hike, then the Ark would have been torn apart by stresses placed on it, Jesus could not have walked on water, etc.
Thus, if someone tells me the Flood could not have happened because E=MC[sup]2[/sup] or the Rapture cannot occur because G=m[sub]1[/sub]m[sub]2[/sub]/r[sup]2[/sup] ... they will get a "science can take a hike" from me.
Absolutely not.Just as you expect one to accept the Bible in its entirety then should you accept science in its entirety.
Yes, I can.You cannot pick and choose what you like and discard what you don't like in both!
To a point.
Then you hit a missing link that you conveniently gloss over.
Then another, then another, then another, and so on.
I once used a person's OP to calculate some 288 trillion missing links.
To a point.
Then you hit a missing link that you conveniently gloss over.
Then another, then another, then another, and so on.
I once used a person's OP to calculate some 288 trillion missing links.
It's actually impossible to do so in science: science hangs together as a system - failure to allow for radioactive decay, for example, has the secondary problem that you're then denying GPS satellites will work.Just as you expect one to accept the Bible in its entirety then should you accept science in its entirety. You cannot pick and choose what you like and discard what you don't like in both!
No, "missing links" are false ideas created by creationists. It was never predicted that we would find every step of evolution preserved in the fossil record. In fact the opposite is predicted. Evolution is proved beyond a reasonable doubt even with all of the so called missing links.
And of course when it comes to man from other apes it was one of you guys that identified the "missing link". Of course that would be above your level of understanding.
So they are more or less "virtual links?"No, "missing links" are false ideas created by creationists. It was never predicted that we would find every step of evolution preserved in the fossil record.
This, of course, will win their approval, and when Jesus shows up at the end of the Tribulation to set up His kingdom, scientists will be frothing at the mouth to vanquish Him before He even gets started.
So now scientists will be fighting Jesus on behalf of satan and evil? In a post full of absolute undiluted poppycock, you've really excelled yourself.
He has been watching too many of the End Time Dramas.
Yes ... in my opinion.So now scientists will be fighting Jesus on behalf of satan and evil?
It's about time.In a post full of absolute undiluted poppycock, you've really excelled yourself.
Ya, Sub, can you answer that? You're the one who called it 'poppycock'. Perhaps you're some kind of authority on it?And what does he do with all the devoutly Christian scientists? Who do they fight for?
Yes ... in my opinion.
It's about time.
Was this question aimed at me? If so can you ask it more clearly?Ya, Sub, can you answer that? You're the one who called it 'poppycock'. Perhaps you're some kind of authority on it?
I'd love to hear your answer.
Good for them.Science and scientists are trying to describe and understand the real world.
I don't need a mistranslator.What you are really saying is that you think the real world is influenced by satan and is untrustworthy -
Link, please.- "the real world can take a hike" as you have said.
I see.This gives you a problem because the Bible is just a book that exists in the real world.
Link, please, scientist?It's contents are just marks on bits of paper that exist only in the real world, the one you've told to take a hike.
Yes.You see the problem?
Oh, I'm sure someone will find you and others inside my head, pretending to know what I stand for.As I mentioned before, your nonsensical beliefs cut you off from everything outside your own head and leave you with nothing.
I'd say that's par for the course.Actually, what I meant was that the rest of your post was drivel,
Taking me to a new low now, are we?... but this part showed something much darker and less palatable than goofy old AV161VET, the harmless fool with his harebrained ideas.
Um ...Was this question aimed at me?
... yes?He has been watching too many of the End Time Dramas.
And what does he do with all the devoutly Christian scientists? Who do they fight for?
Why is this question aimed at me, scientist?If so can you ask it more clearly?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?