Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What's wrong?No need. I know what you denied.
Then you contradicted yourself.
I will let it stand there.
What's wrong?
Don't want to research your own words?
Isn't that what scientists are known for? research?
As I said, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.
Fair enough.The research has already been done.
There is no need to do it again.
Ever hear of the little Grand Canyon that was formed in a very short time frame? Complete with stratified walls.
What's wrong?
Don't want to research your own words?
Isn't that what scientists are known for? research?
As I said, I'll be more than happy to do it for you.
You see, I know what you said ... you don't.
That's what happens when one ridicules; they forget their own words.
The ridiculed often cannot see how they are wrong.
I don't mean to ridicule you.
But you talk "scientific method," while doing anything but.
For once, I'd like to see a scientific methodist use this method constructively to properly evaluate someone who dares disagree with them.
What would falsify the flood?
Nephilim
And how did I justify Goliath being a Nephilim, when all the Nephilim were destroyed in the Flood, Mr. Scientific Methodist?Besides, I thought that you believed that Goliath might have been part Nephilim.
How could that have happened without Nephy's surviving the flood?
You are being inconsistent. But don't worry, all creationists are.
And how did I justify Goliath being a Nephilim, when all the Nephilim were destroyed in the Flood, Mr. Scientific Methodist?
Hey, scientist, while you're doing some real research for a change and looking up how I justified Goliath, can you answer me this?
If all eight aboard the Ark had brown eyes, how is it we have people with green eyes now?
(If you can answer that, you'll know how I justified Goliath.)
Simple: there was no Ark!Hey, scientist, while you're doing some real research for a change and looking up how I justified Goliath, can you answer me this?
If all eight aboard the Ark had brown eyes, how is it we have people with green eyes now?
(If you can answer that, you'll know how I justified Goliath.)
Simple: there was no Ark!
Dear mzungu, Correction: The was an Ark and the Flood totally destroyed the firmament of Adam, exactly as God told us it did. It is YOUR interpretation which is obviously in error. It's caused by the clouding of your vision by the darkness.
IF there was NO Ark, there would NEVER have been ANY humans on our Planet Earth, since that's how Adam's descendants escaped the first world. which was "clean dissolved" Isaiah 24:19 in the Flood. Don't believe me, then tell us HOW and WHEN evolution produced human intelligence in Apes. Like all other Evols, you will fail miserably. But go ahead and TRY.
In Love,
Aman
According to the cladistics yes, but then by those rules we are fish. I am not disagreeing with that at all. It just matters how you define "reptiles".
What I love about cladistics is that it takes away the creationist claim of "kind after kind".
Ever hear of the little Grand Canyon that was formed in a very short time frame? Complete with stratified walls.
The issue still remains that the meandering shape of the entire GC (not merely the Colorado river at the bottom) is utterly inconsistent with the Flood model. We know from actual observations that catastrophic flows produce straight, wide, flat-bottomed channels. For the Flood model to account for the GC, you have to explain how a high-energy, high-volume flow could produce a meandering canyon. Spoiler: you can't do this unless you can prove that the laws of physics were different in the past.
I'd also like an explanation for how alluvial deposits formed in the middle of this
Flood.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?