Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And we are all aware of the vast amount of empty space, free of mass or energy, that exists.
Starting with "nothing"
I am complaining about the content simply because it was not accurately recorded.Then you may not complain about the content, if it's not recorded accurately.
Creationism is the idea that a force outside of natural laws has had an impact on our reality.
The only way to test a theory or concept available to us is a "natural" set of tools.
So Creationism exists outside of the boundaries of the scientific method.
The Scientific Method can only examine that which is natural and duplicatable.
For example, if a scientist in a labcoat was able to instantly create an apple,
say, pull one out of a tabletop wormhole, he could say "There! That might be how God did it!"
After you listed up items included in Creationism, then you can easily see on yourself what would it take to falsify them. How many items can you list? Just one which happened to be unfalsifiable?
Before you want to falsify anything, you need to understand it FIRST!
the RNA world hypothesis is a failure.I've read a couple. Self replicating molecules like some kinds of enzymes would be subject to natural selection and thus evolution. And it's not that hard to get basic materials.
i believe as soon as science proves abiogenesis, this would put to rest forever a notion of a god.
despite its best efforts, science has been unable to do that.
science doesn't even have a plausible scenario for how it could have happened.
What else do you assume?
It doesn't try to discredit evolution and your understanding of what it is all about is apparent. Most creationists accept evolution as defined but do not feel that evolution is a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plan.
naturally occuring, as in finding them lying around like you would diamonds or salt.Have you got a valid scientific source to support this claim?
So that would be bad for the other animals? Why just us?
Given the number of people who do believe our world exists, then likely it does.
The same goes for God.
Just as the title says. What evidence could show that creationism was wrong? And I am talking hypothetical here (I've seen that some people here have trouble grasping that concept).
Instead of wasting space with this vague post that doesn't move the thread forward one bit.... you could also simply answer the question being asked.
Why don't you?
How to falsify creationism?
The earth came into existence ex nihilo by divine fiat on the first day of the creation week in 4004 BC.I'm not talking about science, AV, I'm talking about evidence.
A student needs to figure out his question. Otherwise, he may think that he knows everything.
No.... did he promise that the rapture would come in his disciples lifetime?
No.
In fact, Jesus said they were going to die as well.
Mark 10:37 And they said unto him, We can. And Jesus said unto them, Ye shall indeed drink of the cup that I drink of; and with the baptism that I am baptized withal shall ye be baptized:
See also:
John 21:20 Then Peter, turning about, seeth the disciple whom Jesus loved following; which also leaned on his breast at supper, and said, Lord, which is he that betrayeth thee?
John 21:21 Peter seeing him saith to Jesus, Lord, and what shall this man do?
John 21:22 Jesus saith unto him, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee? follow thou me.
John 21:23 Then went this saying abroad among the brethren, that that disciple should not die: yet Jesus said not unto him, He shall not die; but, If I will that he tarry till I come, what is that to thee?
Compare:Maybe I'm misreading but where in those quotes does it say that the disciples were going to die before Jesus's return?
That's bologna.asherahSamaria said:All of the following seem to disagree - though, of course, both Luke and Mathew just copied from Mark in the first place.
I won't.asherahSamaria said:Don't tell me this is a ...gasp ... contradiction?
Read the next three verses.Matt 16:28 There be some standing here, which shall not taste of death, till they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.
At one point in His ministry, Jesus sent His disciples out two-by-two.asherahSamaria said:Matt 10:23 When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another. I tell you the truth, you will not finish going through the cities of Israel before the Son of Man comes.
These are dispensational passages.asherahSamaria said:Matt 24:34 I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
Mark 13:30 I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
Luke 21:32 I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened.
I'm going to ask you to stop making vague comments and just answer the question of the OP
That depends on how exactly you would define it. I assume you're referring to one of the Christian varieties. YEC? Gap creationism?Just as the title says. What evidence could show that creationism was wrong? And I am talking hypothetical here (I've seen that some people here have trouble grasping that concept).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?