Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evidence that the majority of scientists call illusion.What evidence do you have that evolution is anything other than a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plan? what could be guiding it? someone's imagination?
Other animals do not have Gods because they have no imaginations with which to imagine Gods.
I guess you aren't aware that whois doesn't believe in God. Your creationist bias is showing again.It can probably be taken for granted that there will one day be a viable theory about how life got started in the first place, but that definitely will not be any reason for concluding that God does not exist. That would only follow if your only reason for believing in him in the first place was to plug a gap in the scientific world view. Your god would have been a god of the gaps, in other words.
It doesn't try to discredit evolution and your understanding of what it is all about is apparent. Most creationists accept evolution as defined but do not feel that evolution is a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plan.
Illusion? are you happy with that? although if you have no evidence what choices are there? dismissal or a delusion.Evidence that the majority of scientists call illusion.
What evidence do you have that evolution is anything other than a mindless, unguided, undirected process with no goals or plan? what could be guiding it? someone's imagination?
Other animals do not have Gods because they have no imaginations with which to imagine Gods.
That's right, what a God needs, does or can do is limited only by the imagination of the believer, after all none of the Gods exist in the dimensions of the believers so what else is a believer supposed to do other than use their imaginations.I don't feel those words are accurate. Under the premise that God is the Alpha and Omega
then what begins and ends are both known quantities. God doesn't need to engage in control,
guidance, or direction. The beginning, middle and end are all known quantities.
Is what beneficial or not imagining gods? to a certain extent yes if it reduces anxiety.Is that beneficial, or not?
I guess you aren't aware that whois doesn't believe in God. Your creationist bias is showing again.
this is why it needs to be one continuous reaction, to remove all doubt about intelligent intervention.Which makes my point, even if they could get life to form, it would be from intelligent design.
try not to let it worry you, i get that constantly.I guess you must have misread my post, because I am certainly not a creationist.
So how does that make what I said inaccurate?I don't feel those words are accurate. Under the premise that God is the Alpha and Omega
then what begins and ends are both known quantities. God doesn't need to engage in control,
guidance, or direction. The beginning, middle and end are all known quantities.
Is what beneficial or not imagining gods? to a certain extent yes if it reduces anxiety.
I am sorry whois, I am not getting you here. I don't see that as significant.this is why it needs to be one continuous reaction, to remove all doubt about intelligent intervention.
the only way you could use the "intelligent" scenario is if you had many separate reactions and then mixing the reactants in the right proportion.
having one continuous reaction removes that possibility.
God doesn't need to engage in control,So how does that make what I said inaccurate?
Your biased against creationists.I guess you must have misread my post, because I am certainly not a creationist.
That's right, what a God needs, does or can do is limited only by the imagination of the believer, after all none of the Gods exist in the dimensions of the believers so what else is a believer supposed to do other than use their imaginations.
okay, to take a very simple example.I am sorry whois, I am not getting you here. I don't see that as significant.
Your biased against creationists.
I don't think He "needs" to do anything. He wants us to see His work in the universe and all living things. He says that HE did it that way so we would know He exists.God doesn't need to engage in control,
guidance, or direction. Those words don't
apply unless God is stuck with linear time
like us.
Speaking from experience with this intelligence...God He is far more complex than we can imagine and He claims to be the Christian God.okay, to take a very simple example.
sodium and chlorine.
you bring these two elements together and you get salt.
no intelligence involved.
OTOH, organometallic compounds require an intelligence to create, they are not naturally occurring compounds.
they do however exist inside life, two of the most common are hemoglobin and chlorophyll.
even this doesn't point to an intelligence because these compounds could have been made by various proteins, themselves created by DNA.
even if an intelligence is "proved", it by no means proves it to be "religious and holy".
there are other sources of intelligence other than a religious one.
a transdimensional entity could be this intelligence, existing neither here nor there, but existing nonetheless.
i honestly believe that we will find that the universe is infinite, at the very least FAR more complex than what we now can imagine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?