rogsr said:
In case any of don't watch the news or have not been there, Iraq is a complete mess. They are on the brink of civil war, and the UN has now called this action illegal. It does not matter how strong ones military is if the people who are being fought against are angry enough to not want to stop fighting. Oh, and by the way, do really think that the insurgents that we are now engaged against are all terrorists? Because if so, I would have to tell you that they are mostly normal everyday Iraqi citizens, not al-qaeda operatives. Our military is performing awesome, as we should, but our leaders have completely dropped the ball.
My biggest complaint about GW is that he was too big of a coward to fight his war. So, in what world does he have the right to send me off to die in this war? Our beautiful flag is now soaked in blood and oil.
I don't want to attack mr. B's faith, however, a man known as the "texecutioner," because he did not stay a single execution as governor, can not be merciful, and need I remind that, "Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy."
The part I omitted I will grant you as probably true.
But please list your sources for the rest of this post.
What part of this war was not to be expected?
Conquering a country requires the cost of lives. Be it slaughter of all people in the country or the killings we are seeing now.
The only way to ensure this type of problem is to kill all people in a land. It's the only way to know that there is no one trying to kill you.
I don't believe Iraq is near civil war. They might be if we left. Several different tribes fighting for leader role.
Now on to the another point. President Bush served his country during the Vietnam war. He served in the GUard. He flew jets to various parts of the world. He was not directly apart of the war, but he helped.
I was not in Grenada, but I was in the Air Force then. Am I a coward?
Would you have went if Clinton had the courage to fight a war? A draft dodger?
3point: I ask you,if the jurys found the murderers guilty and all appeals are
used up, why should a governor stay an executiuon?
That would say that the governor would be saying the courts weren't doing there job.
With 1000's of murders daily, people are worried about the few executions we have? I think we need to have "swifter" punishment. Not 20 yearsof waiting.
2 years at most.
(I forgot to add I was in Basic training during Granada.)