Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What better tests? I wasn't too impressed with this one.MoonlessNight said:This thread caused me to look at other (better) tests online, and I found that while Aquinas, Plato and Kant generally were high on the lists (as well they should be), apparantly my mish-mash of beliefs signals all of the triggers for Spinoza, though I don't really agree with him on many issues.
Well, this a blantantly ethical quiz (and therefore not really for this section), but the first quiz was secretly about ethics as well, so for comparison:MidnightBlue said:What better tests? I wasn't too impressed with this one.
I don't agree with anybody about everything, but I like Spinoza much better than Plato.
1. SpinozaMoonlessNight said:For the record on that test I got Aquinas first, Spinoza second and Kant third.
This test is considerably better.MoonlessNight said:Well, this a blantantly ethical quiz (and therefore not really for this section), but the first quiz was secretly about ethics as well, so for comparison:
http://www.selectsmart.com/PHILOSOPHY/
MoonlessNight said:
I was very surprised that although Simone de Beauvoir is listed on the information page -- so presumably included in the test -- she didn't appear anywhere on my results at all.Eudaimonist said:No surprise that Aristotle rated so highly, though I'm surprised that Ayn Rand rated so low.
See? How is it possible to score 96% for Nel Noddings, and nothing for Simone de Beauvoir? I think they forgot to include de Beauvoir in the test.Multi-Elis said:3. Nel Noddings (96%)
I don't either, but there's actually more to the categorical imperative than that.Abbadon said:I got:
I think Kant is a bit odd in that I don't think we should act as if our Morals should be universal morals.
MidnightBlue said:I don't either, but there's actually more to the categorical imperative than that.
At least in his ethical system. But the categorical imperative includes, for instance, the idea that you should never treat other people as a means to an end, and I can agree with that.Abbadon said:Most every "dummie's guide to philosofee" I've seen basically had that as the biggest difference between him and other philosophers that held similar views on the other subjects.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?