Nomarga
Newbie
Apologies in advance for getting off-topic, I'll try to keep it as brief as I can.
Direct observation is not required for something to be proven to be as true as one can tell. (There are many cases of natural selection at work, but that usually doesn't slake the thirsts of the "crocoduck evolution" crowd) This does not only happen in the realm of science. In practically all court cases there isn't video footage of the entire crime in progress, but a verdict is nonetheless delivered. Yes, sometimes the verdicts are wrong, but one can only respond to the degree of evidence available.
The ToE is not dependent on abiogenesis. However life occurred, it evolved through the process of natural selection. This is why the Catholic and Anglican churches have openly accepted the ToE.
Science is full of things it can't scientifically prove? That, by definition, is impossible. An unfalsifiable idea can never make it through the scientific method, which (somewhat relevantly) is why ID is not science.
Whatever theories you attribute to existence.
A simple example is you can't prove evolution without making assumptions about things that you have not observed.
Direct observation is not required for something to be proven to be as true as one can tell. (There are many cases of natural selection at work, but that usually doesn't slake the thirsts of the "crocoduck evolution" crowd) This does not only happen in the realm of science. In practically all court cases there isn't video footage of the entire crime in progress, but a verdict is nonetheless delivered. Yes, sometimes the verdicts are wrong, but one can only respond to the degree of evidence available.
r035198x said:Even if you could prove it, it also relies on other theories that assume activities that also have not been observed (the origin of the species that evolved).
The ToE is not dependent on abiogenesis. However life occurred, it evolved through the process of natural selection. This is why the Catholic and Anglican churches have openly accepted the ToE.
r035198x said:Now faith is believing in what you have not seen and what you cannot scientifically prove. Science is full of those things.
Science is full of things it can't scientifically prove? That, by definition, is impossible. An unfalsifiable idea can never make it through the scientific method, which (somewhat relevantly) is why ID is not science.
Upvote
0