• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What is wrong with Calvinism ?

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, they don't "fit just as good."
"What you care about" is incorrect.

For your "interpretation" of imputed righteousness is not in agreement with its presentation in Genesis 15:6 and Romans 4:2-3 where it is ascribed/counted as/credited to/reckoned to Abraham simply because he believed, not because of anything (works) he did, and where that principle is applied to the NT in Romans 4:1-11.
Not being familiar with the issue of Romans 1-5--all righteousness is only from God (Romans 3:21), you seek to interpret it outside that context.
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Although God does choose individuals for certain purposes which may or may not have anything to do with their salvation.

God does nothing nebulously.

When a passage of Scripture doesn't make good sense to a person, it is not saying that Reason trumps Scripture, for that person to look about for another way to see that passage of Scripture.

The real problem with, "This is speaking of us, all the faithful collectively, not choosing individually.", is that it just doesn't make sense. It's pretty obvious that cause-and-effect is pervasive, and that chance cannot cause anything, and that God is first cause, which means that EVERYTHING that is not him is what it is by his plan and purpose. I don't mean that God does nothing collectively, but when he does, it is individuals to whom he does it.

Even in Heaven the Bride of Christ, a collective, is made of individuals.


Should one also bring to the table, a blank mind, as far as reason is concerned? There is certainly value in reading with a mind like a child, but there is also value in maturity, which includes not only Godliness, but wisdom, knowledge and understanding.

Whether by 'doctrine' you intend such things as the tenets of Reformed Theology (or any other theology) or not, we ALL —even the unbelievers— have theology; we all have our doctrine. We also have our worldview, which is impossible to shed, though wise to bear in mind that we do have one (not at all saying that our worldview cannot change —it is constantly being revised, as we learn and mature).

(Ha! Personally, I find the attempt to read without preconceptions distracting. How does one do that? I remember taking a speedreading course, but found my mind incapable of following the method, simultaneous with paying attention to what my eyes were scanning!)
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Although God does choose individuals for certain purposes which may or may not have anything to do with their salvation.
But why would God "choose individuals for certain purposes which...may not have anything to do with their salvation" yet not choose individuals for salvation? Are you implying that freewill only applies to salvation?

If, according to your statement, God can choose specific individuals for specific things, does not (according to your theology) that choice infringe on their freewill? Is it not inconsistent to complain that God choosing specific individuals for salvation infringes on their freewill but not these?
 
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
Although God does choose individuals for certain purposes which may or may not have anything to do with their salvation.
But why would God "choose individuals for certain purposes which...may not have anything to do with their salvation" yet not choose individuals for salvation? Are you implying that freewill only applies to salvation?

If, according to your statement, God can choose specific individuals for specific things, does not (according to your theology) that choice infringe on their freewill? Is it not inconsistent to complain that God choosing specific individuals for salvation infringes on their freewill but not these?
 
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Very interesting video, Thanks. Also read your essay, also interesting. When you were writing about evil it kept reminding me of Ecclesiastes 12: "Remember thy creator in the days of thy youth, before the evil days come" and goes on to describe ageing and death in a highly metaphorical way so evil does not seem to always mean sin but sometimes does. Just thinking about where God says He creates evil----just rambling : )
 
Reactions: zoidar
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I'm having a bit of trouble getting that concept through my head. Are you saying God chose, from before anyone was born, some nebulous group that does not include individuals? What was he thinking!
Why am I not surprised u are having trouble getting something through your head? And trying to change what I said, shame on you.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why do then Genesis and Exodus say people sinned before the Law was given?
What about Sodom and Gomorrah?
And Cain and the flood, and the tower of Babble and, and, and-----------
Between Adam and Moses, there was no covenant nor law of God in force whose penalty was death, both spiritual and physical.
The issue of Romans 5:12-14 is sin-to-death, not just sin. . .as Adam's sin was sin-to-death, both spiritual and physical--"Dying, you shall die," (Genesis 2:17), which is the only reason Adam died.

The issue of Romans 5:12-14 is why all died when no law of sin-to-death was in force, as it was with Adam, and later with Moses to Christ.
The answer is Romans 5:18, all those born of Adam were condemned to death by Adam's transgression, just as (so also) all those born of Christ are justified (declared righteous) by Christ's obedience (the cross).
There is no transgression of the Law of Moses without the Law of Moses obviously. But
there were still sin before Moses.
The issue of Romans 5:12-14 is that sin was not to physical and spiritual death by a law of God. . .yet they all died, as did Adam who sinned against a law of God carrying the penalty of death (Genesis 2:17).
Romans 5:12-14 is not about just sin, it is about sin against law carrying a penalty of death, of which there was no such law between Adam and Moses. . .and yet they all died.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
As u well know, it does not matter if it makes sense to u but what ever floats your boat man, go for it.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I can say: "My own faith is credited me as righteousness."

Can you really say: "My own faith is imputed me as righteousness?"
Yes, and that is "credited to" me as righteousness, as well as "imputed to" me as righteousness.

Which is not to say it is my own righteousness imputed to me because of works, but as the text states, the righteousness of Christ is imputed to me (Romans 4:1-11).
To say: "Righteousness is imputed me by my own faith" is not the same thing. Here it can be someone elses righteousness that is imputed.
Precisely. . .having established that no one is righteous (Romans 3:10), that all righteousness is from God alone (Romans 1:17, Romans 3:21, Romans 3:24-25), the only righteousness in existence being the righteousness of God/Christ, it is the only righteousness that can be imputed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Mark Quayle

Monergist; and by reputation, Reformed Calvinist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2018
14,282
6,365
69
Pennsylvania
✟946,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Widowed
This is speaking of us, all the faithful collectively, not choosing individually.
I'm having a bit of trouble getting that concept through my head. Are you saying God chose, from before anyone was born, some nebulous group that does not include individuals? What was he thinking!

Logically, first cause is necessarily specific.


So where's the problem? What you say there is the same thing I say. It does not admit to uncaused free will. Uncaused free will depends on chance, which logically self-contradictory.

Do you know of Molinism? I think that is interesting, and not too far from my view.

Yes, and rejected it outright. It admits what, to my mind at least, is heresy, just as does Arminianism. It rejects omnipotence. A little non-causation is a lot.
 
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
U are being blind to the fact that if one does not know the law of Moses he is a law unto himself and will be judged through Jesus Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Have you noticed how many are reading this thread?
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I'm having a bit of trouble getting that concept through my head. Are you saying God chose, from before anyone was born, some nebulous group that does not include individuals? What was he thinking!
He chose the "church."
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
U are being blind to the fact that if one does not know the law of Moses he is a law unto himself and will be judged through Jesus Christ.
Which has nothing to do with Paul's argument in Romans 5:12-14 regarding no law in force with penalty of death, yet all died.
 
Reactions: Mark Quayle
Upvote 0

Alive2

Active Member
Dec 20, 2019
38
18
69
OKlahoma
✟34,785.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Amen--only God is righteous and that righteousness is extended to the elect by a vehicle and that vehicle is Christ.
 
Reactions: Clare73
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Have you noticed how many are reading this thread?
Reading and responding are like being at home but the electric is off, if u get my drift but maybe they are looking for a fuse, we can always hope.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
29,095
7,512
North Carolina
✟343,569.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Reading and responding are like being at home but the electric is off, if u get my drift but maybe they are looking for a fuse, we can always hope.
Could they just be trying to understand the issue of the imputation of both Adam's sin/guilt to all those born of Adam, and of Christ's obedience/righteousness to all those born of Christ (Romans 5:18-19)?
 
Upvote 0

misput

JimD
Sep 5, 2018
1,026
384
86
Pacific, Mo.
✟173,825.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Could they just be trying to understand the issue of the imputation of both Adam's sin/guilt to all those born of Adam, and of Christ's obedience/righteousness to all those born of Christ (Romans 5:18-19)?
We can always hope.
 
Upvote 0