What is the sudden attraction to children?

[Divide]

Back in the good days,

Back in the good old days, they stayed in the closet and kept themselves away from us normal people.

 

[Divide]

Does “all of those people” include the 90%+ of heterosexuals who had sex outside of marriage, or is that “sexual immorality” different because reasons?

Well, let me see here, Yes, yes it would be included in sexual immorality. Yep. Lump all the fringe types into the same basket, even the heterosexual immoralities.

Sexual imorality is sexual immorality. Why would you seek to separate sexual immorality into sub sections.

You try to call it some form of culture. I believe it is more accurately said to be, a sub-culture thing.

 

[DaisyDay]

And a law change suddenly makes it safe and appropriate for school children to be exposed to now?

It was never unsafe for the children, just for the gay people.

 

[DaisyDay]

Oh yeah? Well that doesnt mean that you can shove it down the folks throats who are conservative and adhere to traditional values.

Are you afraid of catching teh gay? It's not contagious.

No one is shoving anything down your throat - if you don't like Drag Queen Story Time, simply don't attend and forbid your minor children from attending. Simple as that.

Anyone with surreptitious origins are of questionable validity

How do you figure that?

and therefore not welcome at our schools!

It's their schools, too. They pay school taxes and may very well have school age children.

Go invite some to dinner if you like them so much. But stay out of our schools.

Don't sign the permission slips if you are afraid of your kids getting ensnared by the exotic.

 

[Divide]

It was never unsafe for the children, just for the gay people.

Wow. Is that true?

 

[Desk trauma]

Well, let me see here, Yes, yes it would be included in sexual immorality. Yep. Lump all the fringe types into the same basket, even the heterosexual immoralities.

How is a super majority of the population the fringe?

Sexual imorality is sexual immorality. Why would you seek to separate sexual immorality into sub sections.

Because not all the things classed as sexually immorality by Christians are the same thing.

You try to call it some form of culture. I believe it is more accurately said to be, a sub-culture thing.

A group that contains 90%+ of the population cannot be classified as a sub culture.

 

[JustOneWay]

Back in the good old days, they stayed in the closet and kept themselves away from us normal people.

What is normal? Normal according to you?

I understand the closet. I've been saying for years that is what the right is trying to do.

It isn't free for people to live in a closet, and so they are at the mercy of those who tell them what to do, where to go and how to act. I guess freedom only works for those who say what freedom is.

 

[JustOneWay]

They still do in this case. Parents are under no obligation to take their kids to the library for book readings. Don't think my parents ever took me to a story hour. (I read my own books.)

It isn't about you or me. Parents in favor of reading hour lose their choice. If a parent wants to take their son or daughter to enjoy a story at the library, but realize that others deemed the entertainment to be immoral because of the attire or the content of the story and have banned from telling stories to children. That parent and child will not be enjoying the story because others determined that Frank should not be reading to children. No freedom there. I suppose the solution is to have the reader telling the story from within in the library closet.

 

[Hans Blaster]

It isn't about you or me. Parents in favor of reading hour lose their choice. If a parent wants to take their son or daughter to enjoy a story at the library, but realize that others deemed the entertainment to be immoral because of the attire or the content of the story and have banned from telling stories to children. That parent and child will not be enjoying the story because others determined that Frank should not be reading to children. No freedom there. I suppose the solution is to have the reader telling the story from within in the library closet.

Could you give us a specific example of a public library that has replaced *all* children's book readings with DQSH, because otherwise its just a matter of more limited options for the non-DQSH going parents.

(And what do you have against "Frank"? Does that name connote evil in some language I don't know?)

 

[RileyG]

Not even close to being the same.

How so? It's incredibly offensive to women.

 

[RileyG]

Took a poll, did you?

There are many here. Why should that be an issue?

 

[RileyG]

A man putting on makeup and costume to look like a woman--and a very bad representation of one at that?
No different from a white person putting on black makeup to make himself look like a black person.

Amen! Exactly my reasoning.

 

[Pommer]

Back in the good old days, they stayed in the closet and kept themselves away from us normal people.

You don’t mind them existing if you don’t ever have to encounter one?

 

[Aldebaran]

It was never unsafe for the children, just for the gay people.

How about whether homosexuality and drag queens that perform for them in gay bars is appropriate for children while in school?

 

[Aldebaran]

What is normal? Normal according to you?

I understand the closet. I've been saying for years that is what the right is trying to do.

It isn't free for people to live in a closet, and so they are at the mercy of those who tell them what to do, where to go and how to act. I guess freedom only works for those who say what freedom is.

Welcome to civilization, where law and order exists.

 

[JustOneWay]

Welcome to civilization, where law and order exists.

If law and order meant anything, trump would already be in prison.

 

[Aldebaran]

If law and order meant anything, trump would already be in prison.

Ah, now it's about Trump again (as usual).

 

[JustOneWay]

Ah, now it's about Trump again (as usual).

I understand. It is difficult to mention law and order when the republican front-runner for the party is under a criminal indictment. It makes saying 'law and order' rather silly and meaningless. Welcome to the real world where criminal actions have consequences.

 

[Gene2memE]

All of them get tossed into the same catagory of sexual immorality. Gay trans, pedo's, biwhatever, all of them. Even drag queens.

Huge category error. Please don't conflate pedophilia with being gay, bi or trans. Those things are not the same. They're not even in the same category of behaviour.

Also, and I'm repeating myself, you can be straight and still be a drag queen (or drag king). Your sexual attraction has no bearing on whether you dress up in the clothing of the opposite gender.

Question: Do the drag queens have a letter yet? Do they want their own classification?

This comment makes it painfully obvious you have very little grasp of the subject matter. Maybe try doing some reading by experts in the subject? It will only save you from embarrassment.

 

[Aldebaran]

I understand. It is difficult to mention law and order when the republican front-runner for the party is under a criminal indictment. It makes saying 'law and order' rather silly and meaningless. Welcome to the real world where criminal actions have consequences.

There haven't been any consequences for those who practice sexually deviant behavior now targeting children in school. Since that's basically the topic of the thread, how about sticking to that discussion, hmmmm?