Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
What is the right balance?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MorkandMindy" data-source="post: 74036100" data-attributes="member: 172332"><p>Both parties agreed there had to be provision for those who can not provide for themselves.</p><p></p><p>The Labour Party wanted a bit more in the way of equality of result, some redistribution of wealth through the tax system. </p><p></p><p>I think in the end it was decided that was partly harming the incentive to work harder but more it was just unnecessary and the aspirations of the Labour Party to get the USSR into British politics was just not acceptable.</p><p></p><p>Unfortunately British politics did not remain between those two points and Neoliberalism has nuked the political scene there just as it has here, we are only now making an attempt to put things back to sanity but it will cost money whatever route is taken. But we are a step ahead of Britain because they have to get out of the EU and then as Nigel Farage pointed out, work out what they actually want.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MorkandMindy, post: 74036100, member: 172332"] Both parties agreed there had to be provision for those who can not provide for themselves. The Labour Party wanted a bit more in the way of equality of result, some redistribution of wealth through the tax system. I think in the end it was decided that was partly harming the incentive to work harder but more it was just unnecessary and the aspirations of the Labour Party to get the USSR into British politics was just not acceptable. Unfortunately British politics did not remain between those two points and Neoliberalism has nuked the political scene there just as it has here, we are only now making an attempt to put things back to sanity but it will cost money whatever route is taken. But we are a step ahead of Britain because they have to get out of the EU and then as Nigel Farage pointed out, work out what they actually want. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
What is the right balance?
Top
Bottom