Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not only do you need to explain how the eye itself came to be through evolutionary processes, but you also must explain the brain and how the two connect and evolved to form images the organism can perceive.
So the endogenous retrovirus proves that life in all of its complexity undoubtedly arose from mutation?I discuss the endogenous retrovirus evidence in this thread:
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-new-retrovirus-thread.7942101/
Yes, I am the blind one. Funny how before I was ridiculed for saying others were not of the truth, and now the same thing is being said of me. Don't worry though, I'm not offended, because this is what I expect from a person who refuses to believe in an intelligent designer.Wrong, you won't let yourself learn. For those who have not blinded themselves the evidence is more than ample. Again, when you are ready to learn I will gladly help you.
This seems so to you.
How does the organism use these "eyes" to see? How do we know those are eyes?
No, I was asking how cells and DNA evolved if they cannot work apart from eachother.
God created us to reproduce; the very process of reproduction was designed.
You need a brain to interpret what the eye sees, do you not?You don't need a brain in order to have an eye.
Yes, I am the blind one. Funny how before I was ridiculed for saying others were not of the truth, and now the same thing is being said of me. Don't worry though, I'm not offended, because this is what I expect from a person who refuses to believe in an intelligent designer.
This is just your perception.When you demonstrate that you understand the concept of evidence then you can demand it. So far you have only shown that evidence is a foreign notion to you.
Where did this common ancestor come from?I told you that we don't need to know that in order to conclude that all life shares a common ancestor and evolved from that common ancestor.
Obviously.You need a brain to interpret what the eye sees, do you not?
I look at your 'evidence,' but it simply isn't enough to prove your outrageous claims.You are the blind one because you refuse to look at evidence, all the while claim that no evidence exists.
You need a brain to interpret what the eye sees, do you not?
Obviously.
The eye is a useless construction without a brain.
Right, but I know that many evolutionists are quite content in believing that an organism can have useless organs. They say that about the appendix because they are ignorant of what it does!Obviously.
The eye is a useless construction without a brain.
How does this 'eye' work, then?No, you don't need a brain in order to use eyes. Even this one celled creature called a Euglena has an eye. Again, this is a single celled organism. No brain.
I look at your 'evidence,' but it simply isn't enough to prove your outrageous claims.
How does this 'eye' work, then?
Actually I won't because I don't feel like it. If you are willing then you can certainly explain your theory here on this thread and demonstrate how it demolishes the idea that life was created.Then go to the retrovirus thread and demonstrate to us that it isn't evidence for shared ancestry between humans and other apes.
http://www.christianforums.com/threads/the-new-retrovirus-thread.7942101/
I am betting that you won't, because you can't.
Right, but I know that many evolutionists are quite content in believing that an organism can have useless organs. They say that about the appendix because they are ignorant of what it does!
That's an eye-spot, not an eye.No, you don't need a brain in order to use eyes. Even this one celled creature called a Euglena has an eye. Again, this is a single celled organism. No brain.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?