Subduction Zone
Regular Member
There are two choices, you either do not understand or you are lying. I feel that it is much more generous to say that you do not understand and offer to help you to understand.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There are two choices, you either do not understand or you are lying. I feel that it is much more generous to say that you do not understand and offer to help you to understand.Lol, " you just don't understand. " That's all you know how to say. You understand nothing.
No need. Actions like this would leave massive evidence.And how would you know? Are you omniscient?
LeTourneau "Mountain Mover" ScraperYeah, that would sort of leave a mark.
There are two choices, you either do not understand or you are lying. I feel that it is much more generous to say that you do not understand and offer to help you to understand.
I bet you can guess. Hint: It's not about Buddhism.
I bet you can guess. Hint: It's not about Buddhism.
Now I know where the cat that lives here went when he disappeared for a year.Here. Just watch "An Atheist Reads" chapter by chapter take down of Mere Christianity.
There are some authors that this tuber shows no respect to but he honestly respects Lewis' writing. Nevertheless, one can only consider Lewis convincing if one is already a believer--like any book of apologetics.
Not exactly a mustard seed.
I believe James made it clear, when he said:Not exactly a mustard seed.
Despite what some think, the size of the mustard seed is never mentioned.Mustard seeds don't impress me. I've planted smaller ones (radishes, lettuce, onions) and eaten smaller ones (poppy seeds).
So no faith needed then.I believe James made it clear, when he said:
James 2:20 But wilt thou know, O vain man, that faith without works is dead?
So if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you can, with proper work, move a mountain.
20 He replied, “Because you have so little faith. Truly I tell you, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there,’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”Despite what some think, the size of the mustard seed is never mentioned.
And so was my reply. I answered a question, it’s what forums are for.This thread is about falsification of scientific theories in the creation/evolution debate, not "atheism".
Quit dragging "atheists" into your argument. None of your arguments are about the existence or believe in a god, ergo, the "atheism" of some of your sparring partners is irrelevant.
Not recently. You have only made claims. Your Shroud claims were refuted with sources. When it comes to your claims, not so much.
And you do not seem to understand the concept of evidence. Would you care to discuss it?
Where 'creation cells' = protocells, Darwin's theory becomes a slam-dunk!Forensic evidence of creation of cells by credible mainstream scientists which - if true - invalidates Darwin’s theory by the test Darwin himself set!!
Alas. If you read what Darwin said it was quite specific.Where 'creation cells' = protocells, Darwin's theory becomes a slam-dunk!
So who is accusing whom of going off topic?Well, I could tell *that*.
I wondered what *kind* of book about Christianity it was.
(Tinker Grey indicates that it is "apologetics". I think I shall pass then, I can think of nothing less interesting or compelling a subject matter than "apologetics".)
What a 'protocell' is, is currently being defined in numerous objectively testable ways, in objectively models.Protocells are again interesting. But it is also just speculation that they lie on a path to full function cells. And that’s all I’ve said. I’m open to proof, what’s there is just speculation.
Ahh .. but 'forensic evidence' of what, (objectively)? .. A belief?Mountainmike said:My forensic evidence trumps speculation in an evidence contest.
What a 'protocell' is, is currently being defined in numerous objectively testable ways, in objectively models.
What your 'Eucharistic' cells and miracles are, is defined purely by belief/faith.
Ahh .. but 'forensic evidence' of what, (objectively)? .. A belief?
We already know that ...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?