Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The original Hebrew word here is not translated "navel", but rather part of the stomach. Pg 285 of "Wilson's Old Testament Word Studies" (by William Wilson, Hendrickson Publishers) also translates it as the muscles in the region of the belly.
So saying the creature has a navel is inaccurate.
Well other people totally disagree - but it isn't just a navel thing. Testicles and penis are also referred to. It's just that the prudes of the KJV didn't like the references and changed the language.
And none of this has much to do with the old age of the earth anyway.
Ahhhh. I got it. Changes were made to the Scriptures to take out certain wording.
so what version did not take it out, cause i cant seem to find itWell other people totally disagree - but it isn't just a navel thing. Testicles and penis are also referred to. It's just that the prudes of the KJV didn't like the references and changed the language.
And none of this has much to do with the old age of the earth anyway.
so now that you cant disprove the truth you want to talk about something else....yep he's a scientistWell the KJV is renowned for it. Doesn't change the fact that Behemoth is far more mammalian in description than dinosaurian. All of which it off topic from the thread title anyway.
so what version did not take it out, cause i cant seem to find it
KJV said:17 He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together
so now that you cant disprove the truth you want to talk about something else....yep he's a scientist
f they were around here with man, that means they were hear for billions plus 2007 years, being as big as these animals are, wouldnt their be much more remains, and what about plants, i have seen fossilized plants from the day of the dino, they were also much bigger. wouldnt we have more coal due to the billions of years of decomposing?
He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his male organs are wrapped together.I don't know of any version that uses the word penis. But the passage is poetic and the translation from Hebrew ambiguous. Most scholars I have read on this topic state that the translation to English should have used the word pens for tail and testicles for stones.
Stones are testicles.
Well the KJV is renowned for it. Doesn't change the fact that Behemoth is far more mammalian in description than dinosaurian. All of which it off topic from the thread title anyway.
You could be right, thats why im here, i want to learn, but if science contridicts the bible i go with the bible, im am just exploring the possiblities.Yeah - I actually know how to understand science and handle the math. The fact is you can find many discussions of this topic and most scholars conclude the passage refers to a mammal. It's only people refusing to see the obvious usage of tail and stones that cling to the dinosaur hope.
By the way - shouldn't you stop using that piece of technology created via science to type these messages on? After all - isn't science the devil.
No.
Where on Earth do you get your info from? No one has ever said dinosaurs were around more than 250 million years ago. I don't think your knowledge base on this is suffficient to argue the points.
He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his male organs are wrapped together.
Noah Webster Version 1833 Info
this is the only version i can find, and it plainly says it, but how can this one be right and all the others that say thigh, which, all 12 versions that i looked at referred it to, be wrong
and as far as science goes, i do not think it is the devil, as far as what i am typing on, i prefer the term technology
so what do you presume it to be?Most people on here seem KJV crazy and it uses stones. As I said - check out this topic and most scholars seen to favour stones (testicles). The problems on both sides of this issue are the ambiguous nature of thee translations. But most people seem to have come down on the non-mammalian side of this issue.
Eat grass like an ox is another argued phrase. Dinosaurs did not eat grass like an ox - certainly not the long tailed varieties people want to use as their behemoth. The mammal interpretation has far less problems on all levels than pigeon holing dinosaurs to fit the passage.
Most people on here seem KJV crazy and it uses stones. As I said - check out this topic and most scholars seen to favour stones (testicles). The problems on both sides of this issue are the ambiguous nature of thee translations. But most people seem to have come down on the non-mammalian side of this issue.
Eat grass like an ox is another argued phrase. Dinosaurs did not eat grass like an ox - certainly not the long tailed varieties people want to use as their behemoth. The mammal interpretation has far less problems on all levels than pigeon holing dinosaurs to fit the passage.
Most people on here seem KJV crazy and it uses stones. As I said - check out this topic and most scholars seen to favour stones (testicles). The problems on both sides of this issue are the ambiguous nature of thee translations. But most people seem to have come down on the non-mammalian side of this issue.
Eat grass like an ox is another argued phrase. Dinosaurs did not eat grass like an ox - certainly not the long tailed varieties people want to use as their behemoth. The mammal interpretation has far less problems on all levels than pigeon holing dinosaurs to fit the passage.
So tell me how scientist know how old the eath is? they cant compare the earth today with the earth of then. Obviously if dinos were running around, there were a few differences.Technology is the application in producing the product. The theory explanation of how to produce the technology and the principles it operates by is the science. The same science and methodology that shows the Earth is old - no different. In fact the people responsible underwent the same education at the same institutions.
Male reptiles do have testicles that are housed withing the body. Some reptiles do have a penis or hemipenis and is strictly an organ of reproduction, not connected to the urinary tract and can often be seen as two bulges behind the cloaca at the base of the tail.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?