Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just read the book as whole and don’t try to find proof texts. That should clear it up.
Why would He need to die for minor sins?
While circumcision certainly is in focus, it could have been anything that they added to Paul’s gospel. He was addressing grace+. Circumcision just happened to be that issue.Read Acts of the Apostles 15:1, Acts of the Apostles 15:5, and Acts of the Apostles 15:24. It is clear that the counsel was addressing the heresy of Circumcision Salvationism. Paul also did, as well. Read Galatians 5:2.
And what is that sin?Minor faults or transgressions or the sin that does not lead unto death is a bit of a mystery.
In either case, whether Christ died for these sins or not, the point here is that there is a sin that does not lead unto death (See again: 1 John 5:17).
While circumcision certainly is in focus, it could have been anything that they added to Paul’s gospel. He was addressing grace+. Circumcision just happened to be that issue.
It’s still gospel+ that he’s arguing against.No. They were saying that they needed to be circumcised FIRST in order to be saved. This is a replacement of the entrance of gate to being justified by faith in Jesus Christ. If circumcision is the basis for the foundation of one's faith, then it is a work, and not God's grace that one is standing upon.
It’s still gospel+ that he’s arguing against.
1 O foolish Galatians! Who has bewitched you? It was before your eyes that Jesus Christ was publicly portrayed as crucified.
2 Let me ask you only this: Did you receive the Spirit by works of the law or by hearing with faith?
3 Are you so foolish? Having begun by the Spirit, are you now being perfected by the flesh?
4 Did you suffer so many things in vain-if indeed it was in vain?
5 Does he who supplies the Spirit to you and works miracles among you do so by works of the law, or by hearing with faith-
6 just as Abraham "believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness"? - Galatians 3:1-6
How much over the speed limit would be a sin?
And you think you need work. So no difference.So again, they thought they had to be circumcised to be right with God.
There’s a difference in how those sins affect other people. There is no difference between consequences concerning God. If Christ died for the sin, it’s serious.A topic for another thread. The point was not meant to be exhaustive. The point was to show that there is a difference between minor offenses (like parking tickets, etc.) and major crimes like murder, rape, theft, etc. Even our standard of law within our society that is sinful recognizes these differences. Jesus taught us by way of real world examples (i.e. parables). He illustrated spiritual truth by parables. So if your belief is true, then it should have real world examples to back it up. I am comfortable in my belief on this matter in the Scriptures that I can show you real world examples (parables) for it. Can you say the same?
And you think you need work. So no difference.
There’s a difference in how those sins affect other people. There is no difference between consequences concerning God. If Christ died for the sin, it’s serious.
You are splitting hairs, and I’m sad for you. You cheapen the perfect obedience of Christ on our behalf. I honestly pray that God opens your eyes to this. You have a great gift of communication. You are just using it to put yokes on people that Jesus died to remove.No. The difference is that work of circumcision is the foundation of one's salvation and not God's grace through faith in Jesus. Also, circumcision is not a part of any of the commands in the New Testament, either. It is a part of the Old Law and it is trying to take the place of faith in Jesus Christ. So yeah. There is a big difference.
One is God's grace through faith in Christ + works of faith (according to the commands in the NT) vs. Works Alone Salvationism without God's grace.
It’s sad that I’d have to.Again, chapter and verse. Prove your case with the Bible.
Gal 5:24 "those who are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with its passions and desires."
"have crucified" is in the aorist past tense. It's not talking about an ongoing process. Those of use who are in Christ have crucified our flesh in that we reckon ourselves to be dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus. (Rom 6:11) Since we're in Christ sin is an entity distinct from us and has no impact on our destiny. Unlike the theology of salvation-by-works Christians.
You said:You're interpreting the Bible to mean that salvation is contingent upon one's ongoing performance, which is salvation by works. This as opposed to salvation be a settled matter for those in faith as Jesus said, "I tell you the truth, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life and will not be condemned; he has crossed over from death to life." John 5:24
You said:To view salvation as contingent upon works is a rejection of the gospel. It's essentially disobedience to the gospel. You're reading Rom 11:22 to be saying that salvation is contingent upon you doing good things, which is not what it's saying. "His goodness" is not referring to our goodness. But again your interpretation puts you squarely in the salvation by works category of Christian.
You said:As for Heb 3:11-14 it seems to me that you yourself are calling for people to depart from the faith and put in its place your salvation by works theology. Heb 3:14 is talking about evidence that one has genuinely come to really trust in Christ and subsequently been made a partaker of Christ (like myself) in that they do persevere in their faith to the end, despite being exhorted by salvation by works Christians to depart from the faith.
You said:Heb 4:2 is about people like salvation by works Christians to whom I've preached the gospel of grace. But they reject it because of lack of faith on their part.
You said:As for Mt 7:23 which you brought up Jesus says, "I never knew you". He doesn't say, "I used to know you, but then you lost your salvation". People who have come to know him do continue in the faith and lifestyle consistent with that faith. But what salvation by works Christians can't seem to get through their thick skulls is that they do so not in order to be saved nor to maintain their salvation status, but rather they do so because of the new creation.
Like I said, "what salvation by works Christians can't seem to get through their thick skulls is that believers doing good works do so not in order to be saved nor to maintain their salvation status, but rather they do so because of the new creation." Which apparently is a concept which you not only cannot comprehend, you simply ignore the statement itself. And such statements I have made many times. Do the words on the page become invisible to you?So do you take this to mean that when a believer sins, they are not sinning because Christ died in their place, right? If so, the problem with this kind of view is that it is not consistent with the context.
To repeat the same thing I've constantly been saying - those born of God are saved. They do what is right not in order to be saved but because they have been born of God. "No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God." 1John 3:9 Such an idea baffles you. You've proven over the years incapable of comprehending the meaning. And so you've resorted to simply ignoring such statements and continually making false accusations against those of us who believe in the gospel of grace and go on to misread scripture as to mislead others into you salvation by works concepts. All you end up doing is affirming my thread on "Ways Salvation-by-Works Christians misconstrue scripture".Paul's point in leading up to Galatians 5:24 is dealing with crucifying the affections and lusts in the sense of putting sin away by overcoming it (Note: This would be putting away of grievous sin, like lying, lusting, hating, etc.). For Paul says that if we walk in the Spirit, we will not fulfill the lusts of the flesh (Galatians 5:16). Paul says that certain grievous sins can cause one not to inherit the Kingdom of God (Galatians 5:19-21). The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, etc. (Galatians 5:22-23). So the focus here is one's actions and it is not in some kind of sin and still be saved gospel concept (if that is what you are suggesting it is).
Paul is being metaphorical. Much like here.But you have not given any proof Rom 6 is not water baptism or given any proof that it is some type of baptism other than water baptism.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?