Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The general claim in the philosophy of materialism is that inert matter (the elements that make up life forms) became life and then marched forward into more and more complex and diverse life forms to the point of self consciousness naturally.What, exactly, do you mean by that?
And do you have evidence for how you think the first life came into existence?You have no evidence of how life came into existence.
... and diamonds form naturally, and coal forms naturally, and pearls form naturally, and snowflakes form naturally and...The general claim in the philosophy of materialism is that inert matter (the elements that make up life forms) became life and then marched forward into more and more complex and diverse life forms to the point of self consciousness naturally.
The general claim in the philosophy of materialism is that inert matter (the elements that make up life forms) became life
and then marched forward into more and more complex and diverse life forms to the point of self consciousness naturally.
and dogs are also form naturally?
Theological assertions are wisdom. God is the absolute, infinite and eternal truth. The one uncaused reality. Finite man and his material universe isn't the cause, it is the consequence.And do you have evidence for how you think the first life came into existence?
As you believe that the first life in existence was God, I await to see your evidence for how that first life (God) came into existence.
And no, theological assertions are not the same thing as evidence.
None of those examples show how life formed naturally from inert (non living) matter. Coal comes from life, pearls from a living creature.... and diamonds form naturally, and coal forms naturally, and pearls form naturally, and snowflakes form naturally and...
Need I continue?
Still just bluffing. None of that explains how matter was organized into primitive life forms.I don't know where you received lessons in chemistry, but I'ld ask my money back.
The matter that makes up life is anything BUT chemically inert. We aren't made from Helium.
Instead, we are carbon based... Carbon... The most chemically rich element there is. You can make more molecules based on carbon, then you can with all other elements combined.
Yes, it's called biological evolution. Perhaps you've heared it being mentioned a few times in high school biology.
Is there a supernatural aspect of the birth of a dog? I mean, I won't claim to KNOW. I'm unaware of any problem in science explaining dogs coming into this world naturally.That's the faith of the Atheist religion.
there is no intelligence also in an automatic facotry that produce cars. but a car is still evidence for design.
where? reference please. and remember that this is only the first step.
Still just bluffing. None of that explains how matter was organized into primitive life forms.
View attachment 195462
Still just bluffing. None of that explains how matter was organized into primitive life forms.
If we collected all of the elements that that make up a dog, put them in separate piles an observed them congeal together, and a dog popped out, then yes, that would be supernatural. The supernatural happened long ago when the creators of life organized the patterns which eventually evolved into dogs of today. Atheist avoid the explanation of the beginning of life by drawing attention to the evolution of that life as evidenced in the fossil record as well as the living product of those implantations today.Is there a supernatural aspect of the birth of a dog? I mean, I won't claim to KNOW. I'm unaware of any problem in science explaining dogs coming into this world naturally.
The philosophy of materialism (inert matter spontaneously becoming life) isn't science, thats philosophy.What "bluffing"? What are you talking about?
Do you deny what I said? That carbon is the most chemically rich element we know of? That you can make more molecules with carbon then all other elements combined?
And what are you complaining about, really? That science hasn't solved everything there is to solve, answered every question one can come up with, and that more works needs to be done?
That's not a "primitive" life form.
That's a modern organism which is the result of some 3.8 billion years of evolution.
The supernatural happened long ago when the creators of life organized the patterns which eventually evolved into dogs of today.
Atheist avoid the explanation of the beginning of life
by drawing attention to the evolution of that life as evidenced in the fossil record as well as the living product of those implantations today.
Beyond common sense, no. Neither do you have evidence to support the even wilder claim that inert matter decided to become life and develop a faith in origins.Got evidence to support that wild claim?
Really? That's news to me.
Origins of life and origins of diversity of already existing life, are 2 seperate subjects. They don't even belong to the same field of study.
The reason why educated people (not just "atheists") don't conflate the two, is because they understand they are two different subjects.
The philosophy of materialism (inert matter spontaneously becoming life) isn't science, thats philosophy.
Bluffing is drawing attention to what is when someone is talking about how things came to be. Causes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?