What Is Happening That A lot Of People Are Not Aware Of Part 11

waves

not so new
Jun 23, 2011
2,351
756
Visit site
✟94,770.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I put the information below in the news thread and it was removed for not having links to a news article.


What Is Happening That A lot Of People Are Not Aware Of Part 10

See post #20

http://www.christianforums.com/thre...t-of-people-are-not-aware-of-part-10.7900925/




What Is Happening That A lot Of People Are Not Aware Of Part 11



Corporations Providing Free Items

Most often when a company offers free items to students such as scholarships, school supplies, tablets etc it is not done out of the kindness of their heart. It is done to make the company look good, to get media publicity and attention, for branding purposes. There is also another side of corporations providing free items, it has to do with psychological control. Students who can afford it, don’t need free items from companies, sponsorship etc. If persons were able to comfortably to provide for their family, the manipulation that these companies has on the family, students would be greatly reduced. It goes back to what I previously stated in the last post which is:



Political Conditioning

..."Political conditioning should not be confused with training or persuasion or even indoctrination. It is more than that. It is tampering. It is taking possession of both the simplest and the most complicated nervous patterns of man. It is the battle for the possession of the nerve cells. It is coercion and enforced conversion. Instead of conditioning man to an unbiased facing of reality, the seducer conditions him to catchwords, verbal stereotypes, slogans, formulas, symbols. Pavlovian strategy in the totalitarian sense means imprinting prescribed reflexes on a mind that has been broken down. The totalitarian wants first the required response from the nerve cells, then control of the individual, and finally control of the masses. The system starts with verbal conditioning and training by combining the required stereotypes with negative or positive stimuli: pain, or reward. In the P.O.W. camps in Korea where there was individual and mass brainwashing, the negative and positive conditioning stimuli were usually hunger and food. The moment the soldier conformed to the party line his food ration was improved: say yes, and I'll give you a piece of candy! "


http://whale.to/c/rape_of_the_mind.html




Students, teachers at 30 schools to get free tablets

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Students--teachers-at-30-schools-to-get-free-tablets_14151109



Bigger Back To School With LIME And FLOW

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/article/news/20150810/bigger-back-school-lime-and-flow




**Many companies in Jamaica are providing free items to students, families




Mergers in Jamaica and in other countries



RJR, Gleaner announce merger

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/RJR--Gleaner-announce-merger



Gov't approves LIME/Flow merger

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latestnews/Gov-t-approves-LIME-Flow-merger



Gov't to merge 600 basic into infant schools

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20150129/lead/lead8.html



Education ministry still moving to merge primary schools

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news...till-moving-to-merge-primary-schools_19133952



JCF, ISCF merger complete

http://jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20140516/news/news5.html



ONE POLICE FORCE FOR JAMAICA - Red seam and blue seam to merge

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/ONE-POLICE-FORCE-FOR-JAMAICA---Red-seam-and-blue-seam-to-merge



Police Commissioner to merge Flying Squad and OCID

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latestnews/Police-Commissioner-to-merge-Flying-Squad-and-OCID



Digicel/Claro merger in order, court rules

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Digicel-Claro-merger-in-order--court-rules_18137544



Racing Merger Under Way

http://gleaner-ja.com/gleaner/20141029/lead/lead3.html



Gov't moving ahead with plan to merge, close, privatise entities

http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/Gov-t-moving-ahead-with-plan-to-merge--close--privatise-entities




OBAMA PLANS EXECUTIVE ORDER TO FORCE CYBERSECURITY BOONDOGGLE ON AMERICA


..."As James E. Miller and others have noted, it is also a key element of corporatist fascism. “Public-private partnerships are the embodiment of what Mussolini dubbed ‘corporatism;’ that is the ‘merger of state and corporate power.’ Under corporatism, the ruling class is able to expand unbeknownst to the Boobus Americanus and its equivalent in other countries,” Miller writes."


http://www.infowars.com/obama-plans-executive-order-to-force-cybersecurity-boondoggle-on-america/




Just before Hurricane Sandy, Obama signed executive order merging Homeland Security with private sector to create virtual dictatorship


"While all eyes were on Hurricane Sandy in the days leading up to the storm's breach on the mainland of the Northeast, the White House was busy devising new ways to enslave Americans under the guise of protecting national security. On October 26, 2012, Barack Obama quietly signed an Executive Order (EO) establishing the so-called Homeland Security Partnership Council, a public-private partnership that basically merges the Department of Homeland Security(DHS) with local governments and the private sector for the implied purpose of giving the Executive Branch complete and limitless control over the American people."...


..."[W]e must tap the ingenuity outside government through strategic partnerships with the private sector, nongovernmental organizations, foundations, and community-based organizations," says the EO. It goes on to add that the merger between the federal government and the private sector is necessary to facilitate the government's desire to better "address homeland security priorities," which includes things like "responding to natural disasters ... (and) preventing terrorism by utilizing diverse perspectives, skills, tools, and resources."


An official Steering Committee will be established with representatives from virtually every single three and four-letter federal agency, and this committee will be guided by a separate council on how to best incorporate the federal government and DHS into every nook and cranny of American society. Once established, this council will maintain control over presumably all aspects of society by overseeing a secret police force comprised of spies from schools, community groups, churches, and various other local institutions."...


http://www.naturalnews.com/037871_Obama_executive_order_dictatorship.html




None Dare Call it Conspiracy (Book) Page 26


"...If one understands that socialism is not a share-the Wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite. The plan of the conspirator Insiders then is to socialize the United States, not to Communize it.


How is this to be accomplished? Chart 3 shows the structure of our government as established by our Founding Fathers. The Constitution fractionalized and subdivided governmental power in every way possible. The Founding Fathers believed that each branch of the government, whether at the federal, state or local level, would be jealous of its powers and would never surrender them to centralized control. Also, many phases of our lives (such as charity and education) were put totally, or almost totally, out of the grasp of politicians. Under this system you could not have a dictatorship. No segment of government could possibly amass enough power to form a dictatorship. In order to have a dictatorship one must have a single branch holding most of the reins of power. Once you have this, a dictatorship is inevitable."



CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC



gary_allen__none_dare_call_it_co-4.png



…"A dictatorship was impossible in our Republic because power was widely diffused. Today, as we approach Democratic Socialism all power is being centralized at the apex of the executive branch of the federal government. This concentration of power makes a dictatorship inevitable. Those who control the President indirectly gain virtual control of the whole country.


The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes noted: "Freedom is government divided into small fragments." Woodrow Wilson, before he became the tool of theInsiders, observed: "This history of liberty is a history of the limitations of governmental power, not the increase of it." And the English historian Lord Acton commented: "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely." Even though these men lived after our Constitution was written, our forefathers understood these principles completely.


But what is happening today? As we move leftward along the political spectrum towards socialism, all the reins of power are being centralized in the executive branch of the federal government. Much of this is being done by buying with legislation or with "free" federal grants all the other entities. Money is used as bait and the hook is federal control. The Supreme Court has ruled, and in this case quite logically, that it is hardly lack of due process for the government to regulate that which it subsidizes."


If you and your clique wanted control over the United States, it would be impossible to take over every city hall, county seat and state house. You would want all power vested at the apex of the executive branch of the federal government; then you would have only to control one man to control the whole shebang. If you wanted to control the nation's manufacturing, commerce, finance, transportation and natural resources, you would need only to control the apex, the power pinnacle, of an all-powerful SOCIALIST government. Then you would have a monopoly and could squeeze out all your competitors. If you wanted a national monopoly, you must control a national socialist government. If you want a worldwide monopoly, you must control a world socialist government. That is what the game is all "Communism" is not a movement of the downtrodden masses but is a movement created, manipulated and used by power-seeking billionaires in order to gain control over the world first by establishing socialist governments in the various nations and then consolidating them all through a "Great Merger," into an all-powerful world socialist super-state probably under the auspices of the United Nations The balance of this book will outline just how they have used Communism to approach that goal."...


http://www.whale.to/b/allen_b1.html




"...…Socialism is when the people believe that government is god. Communism is when the government becomes god!"...


http://www.worldministries.org/IntNL/Theory_Evolution_Pt2.pdf




The Communist Manifesto

..."The modern bourgeois society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones. Our epoch, the epoch of the bourgeoisie, possesses, however, this distinctive feature: it has simplified the class antagonisms. Society as a whole is more and more splitting up into two great hostile camps, into two great classes, directly facing each other: Bourgeoisie and Proletariat."


..."The French Revolution, for example, abolished feudal property in favour of bourgeois property.


The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois property. But modern bourgeois private property is the final and most complete expression of the system of producing and appropriating products, that is based on class antagonisms, on the exploitation of the many by the few.


In this sense, the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property."...



"Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.


On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among the proletarians, and in public prostitution.


The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.


Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.


But, you will say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.


And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention, direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.


The bourgeois clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parent and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labour.


But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the whole bourgeoisie in chorus.


The bourgeois sees in his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion than that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.


He has not even a suspicion that the real point is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.


For the rest, nothing is more ridiculous than the virtuous indignation of our bourgeois at the community of women which, they pretend, is to be openly and officially established by the Communists. The Communists have no need to introduce community of women; it has existed almost from time immemorial.


Our bourgeois, not content with having the wives and daughters of their proletarians at their disposal, not to speak of common prostitutes, take the greatest pleasure in seducing each other's wives.


Bourgeois marriage is in reality a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with, is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women. For the rest, it is self-evident that the abolition of the present system of production must bring with it the abolition of the community of women springing from that system, i.e., of prostitution both public and private."...



How feminists tried to destroy the family

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-430702/How-feminists-tried-destroy-family.html



International Women's Day

8marta.jpg



..."The 1932 Soviet poster dedicated to the March 8 holiday. The text reads: "8th of March is the day of rebellion of the working women against kitchen slavery" and "Down with the oppression and narrow-mindedness of household work!". Originally in the USSR the holiday had a clear political character, emphasizing the role of the Soviet state in the liberation of women from their second-class-citizen status..."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Women's_Day




The Communist Manifesto Continued


..."The proletariat will use its political supremacy to wrest, by degrees, all capital from the bourgeoisie, to centralise all instruments of production in the hands of the State, i.e., of the proletariat organised as the ruling class; and to increase the total of productive forces as rapidly as possible.


Of course, in the beginning, this cannot be effected except by means of despotic inroads on the rights of property, and on the conditions of bourgeois production; by means of measures, therefore, which appear economically insufficient and untenable, but which, in the course of the movement, outstrip themselves, necessitate further inroads upon the old social order, and are unavoidable as a means of entirely revolutionising the mode of production.



These measures will of course be different in different countries.


Nevertheless in the most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.


1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes.


2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.


3. Abolition of all right of inheritance.


4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.


5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.


6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.


7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.


8. Equal liability of all to labour. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.


9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equable distribution of the population over the country.


10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c., &c.


When, in the course of development, class distinctions have disappeared, and all production has been concentrated in the hands of a vast association of the whole nation, the public power will lose its political character. Political power, properly so called, is merely the organised power of one class for oppressing another. If the proletariat during its contest with the bourgeoisie is compelled, by the force of circumstances, to organise itself as a class, if, by means of a revolution, it makes itself the ruling class, and, as such, sweeps away by force the old conditions of production, then it will, along with these conditions, have swept away the conditions for the existence of class antagonisms and of classes generally, and will thereby have abolished its own supremacy as a class.


In place of the old bourgeois society, with its classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all."...


http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/61/pg61-images.html