Alenci said:I really think physical compatibility is a very worldly idea. Saying things like "I would hesitate to marry so-and-so because he/she won't do xyz sexual act with me" places a heavy emphasis on self-gratification. In a loving marriage, each partner ought to naturally want to do whatever would please the other. It is only because the world has such a focus on self-gratification that sexual relationships break down or become boring.
Whether its self gratification or someone elses gratifaction, it doesnt matter in this case, compatibility is still an issue. If I were to focus on 'gratifying them' then i'd have to know what turned them on, and be 'willing' to do that for them.
I agree that in a perfect loving marriage, we would all do what i partners wanted (providing it didnt mean disrespecting yourself or something). But, unfortauntely things arent like that always.
Sometimes a man might marry a woman, (excuse me if the next part sounds blunt) but all she wants to do is just lay there, or suppose she doesnt agree with anything but intercourse, and only in 1 position, etc.
Worse yet, suppose she for some reason isnt as interested in sex as he is.
when you are married, you are stuck with that, for the rest of your life.
sex is important. if it wasnt, people would not get married but just live together forever instead and keep that promise.
(but of course if they wanted a family, then sex would be necessary)
YouthPastor said:Not sure of what kind of "spark" you are talking about?
chemistry problems?
what if when you actually do get physical with them, you find out you really don't enjoy it? thats what i mean.
If you mean....sexual "spark" or of you like the way they kiss etc... most of those issues can be communicated through
communicating how something is going to go, and how it actually goes, are 2 different things!
Upvote
0