Decon,
My definition of justification is just as yours, to be righteous. And what is it to be righteous? To be just and lawful.
I agree that a man cannot be justified(righteous) by his works alone, I said that before; a man is justified(righteous/lawful) by doing his works AND by faith.
20 But do you want to know, O foolish man, that faith without works is dead?
22 Do you see that faith was working together with his works, and by works faith was made perfect?
And once again, what is works?
29 Jesus answered and said to them, "This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent."
Thus following His commandments.
And did I understand you right, that you think the book of James should be thrown out of the Bible?
Brother, its D-e-
a-c-o-n, not decon. Decon is a brand of insecticide.
You said that to be justified one had to not only have faith, but works as well. Here I quote you:
one must be justified by works and by faith
And you use the book of James as proof.
And what did I say:
So I am sorry, but you have a wrong view of "Justification" from a Baptist standpoint.
And I'll even go further to say you have a wrong view of "justification" period.
Justification is an act of God whereby the sinner is said to be "not guilty" and declared "righteous".
Again, let me quote Boyce:
I. It is a Judicial Act of God.
That God is its author is emphatically declared by Paul in Rom. 8:33; "It is God that justifieth." As he is the lawgiver and judge so must he also be the justifier.
The act is not one of sovereignty, as is election, because he does not justify merely of good pleasure, but because the demands of the law have been met. Yet his act is free, and of grace, because it is of his own choice that he accepts a substitute, and because Christ and his meritorious work have been graciously secured and given by God himself. See Rom. 3:24.
The usage of other words in connection with justification shows it to be a forensic act. The term "righteousness," dikaiosune, which, like "righteous," dikaios, is used in connection with personal righteousness, as of God in Acts 17:31, and of Christ "the Faithful and True," Rev. 19:11, and of the martyrs in Heb. 11:33, and of human obedience to the law in Rom. 10:3, 5; Phil. 3:6, 9, is, in connection with God's justification of sinners, applied, though chiefly by the Apostle Paul, to "the righteousness which God bestows or accepts," and which is imputed to the sinner or reckoned to his account.
Justification, as you put it, depends not on Christ's righteousness imputed to us, but on our faith and
works.
The Apostle Paul plainly tells us that if it was by work, then it isn't by grace, and if it is by grace, then it isn't a work:
"And
if by grace, then is it no more of works: otherwise grace is no more grace. But if it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work." -Rom. 11:6 (KJV)
The way you put it:
one must be justified by works and by faith
You prove Paul's words here:
"Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt." -Rom. 4:4 (KJV)
And again, let me repeat what the Theological Dictionary of the New Testament says about "dikaiow":
It implies the justification of the ungodly who believe on the basis of the justifying action of God in the death and resurrection of Christ. To be sure, the dikaiousqai is an act of grace rather than of retribution according to works. Yet this act of grace in the cross can be called forensic because in the "ilasthrion" judgment is executed on all sin in the Substitute. This dikaioun is the judical acquittal which takes place in the saving present. It is neither exclusively objectively in the cross nor exclusively subjective in experience. It has rather the objectively of relationship, enacted at the cross and apprehended in faith (dikaiosunh). Thus dikaiwqhnai in Gal. 2:16, "to become a righteous man in the eyes of God," the essence of justification being that God helps the sinner to the position and status of one who is righteous in His eyes. this interpretation is valid, though it should be emphasized that the new postition and staus are the result of judical pronouncement.
And yet, you would have us to believe that it is faith and works that justifies us.
You are justified by faith in the life, work, ministry, death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, not of:
And, again, you have a misunderstanding of the book of James.
Paul and James do not contridict each other as you would have us to believe. Romans and James are not contridictory, they are complimentary. Paul addresses those who say they have works with out faith (legalizers), and James addresses those who say they have faith without works. (Judaizers)
James is refuting the belief that a person can have faith without producing any good works (James 2:17-18). James is emphasizing the point that genuine faith in Christ will produce a changed life and good works (James 2:20-26). James is not saying that justification is by faith plus works, but rather that a person who is truly justified by faith will have good works in his life. If a person claims to be a believer, but has no good works in his life – then he likely does not have genuine faith in Christ (James 2:14, 17, 20, 26).
Paul says the same thing in his writings. The good fruit believers should have in their lives is listed in Galatians 5:22-23. Immediately after telling us that we are saved by faith, not works (Ephesians 2:8-9), Paul informs us that we were created to do good works (Ephesians 2:10). Paul expects just as much of a changed life as James does, “Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come” (2 Corinthians 5:17)! James and Paul do not disagree on their teaching on salvation. They approach the same subject from different perspectives. Paul simply emphasized that justification is by faith alone while James put emphasis on the fact that faith in Christ produces good works.
Source
C.K. Moser sums it up in this manner:
"
If a man must still work for salvation we have in Christ an atonement that does not atone."
If your correct, then we have in James the Apostle, a person who is teaching faith plus works in order to be saved. And I quote you:
one must be justified by works and by faith
Here you are linking James as saying that
it is: faith
plus works that equals justification. Here, you make it sound also that James is teaching a works based salvation. Here, you make it sound as though James is saying that works are absolutely necessary for our justification.
So, what works must I do, added to my faith, that justifies me according to James?
Should I give $1 million dollars to charity?
Should I go work at the homeless shelter?
And if asked why I do this, do I look them in the eye and say well, according to the book of James, I have to do this (faith plus works) in order to be justified in the sight of God?
I have Christ's righteousness imputed to me, therefore I am already righteous by virtue of Christ.
I have been justified by Christ in the sight of God.
in Luke chapter 7, Jesus goes to a Pharisees house to eat. While there, we have this account:
"And
one of the Pharisees desired him that he would eat with him. And he went into the Pharisee's house, and sat down to meat.
And, behold, a woman in the city, which was a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at meat in the Pharisee's house, brought an alabaster box of ointment, And stood at his feet behind him weeping, and began to wash his feet with tears, and did wipe them with the hairs of her head, and kissed his feet, and anointed them with the ointment. Now when the Pharisee which had bidden him saw it, he spake within himself, saying, This man, if he were a prophet, would have known who and what manner of woman this is that toucheth him: for she is a sinner. And Jesus answering said unto him, Simon, I have somewhat to say unto thee. And he saith, Master, say on. There was a certain creditor which had two debtors: the one owed five hundred pence, and the other fifty. And when they had nothing to pay, he frankly forgave them both. Tell me therefore, which of them will love him most? Simon answered and said, I suppose that he, to whom he forgave most. And he said unto him, Thou hast rightly judged. And he turned to the woman, and said unto Simon, Seest thou this woman? I entered into thine house, thou gavest me no water for my feet: but she hath washed my feet with tears, and wiped them with the hairs of her head. Thou gavest me no kiss: but this woman since the time I came in hath not ceased to kiss my feet. My head with oil thou didst not anoint: but this woman hath anointed my feet with ointment. Wherefore I say unto thee, Her sins, which are many, are forgiven; for she loved much: but to whom little is forgiven, the same loveth little.
And he said unto her, Thy sins are forgiven. And they that sat at meat with him began to say within themselves, Who is this that forgiveth sins also? And he said to the woman,
Thy faith hath saved thee; go in peace." -Lk. 7:36-50 (KJV)
I certainly am no die hard Bible scholar. But I can read for myself.
I only bring this out because this bears importance here.
What saved this woman, was it her faith or her work?
If you say work, then you are wrong. For it is certain we can do no work that would earn us merit before God.
If you say faith, then the teachings of James is proven wrong and you have to admit you are wrong also.
Show me in this text, where Jesus told her to go and have faith plus works in order to be saved.
Here is another one for you to chew on.
While in Jericho, we are told this little diddy:
"And it came to pass, that as he was come nigh unto Jericho, a certain blind man sat by the way side begging:
And hearing the multitude pass by, he asked what it meant. And they told him, that Jesus of Nazareth passeth by. And he cried, saying, Jesus, thou son of David, have mercy on me. And they which went before rebuked him, that he should hold his peace:
but he cried so much the more, Thou son of David, have mercy on me. And Jesus stood, and commanded him to be brought unto him: and when he was come near, he asked him,
Saying, What wilt thou that I shall do unto thee? And he said, Lord, that I may receive my sight. And Jesus said unto him, Receive thy sight: thy faith hath saved thee." -Lk. 18:35-42 (KJV)
In this passage, what saved this man and gave him his sight back?
Was it faith plus works, or was it faith alone in Jesus Christ?
In fact, doesn't dispise the idea of works righteousness? (cf. Mt 23)
Are we obedient
in order to be saved or becase we
are saved? In fact, doesn't the Bible teach that people are obedient because God has
already saved them? (cf 2 Cor. 9:8; James 2:26; 1 Jn. 3:9; 4:7; 5:18)
Jesus never taught the way to eternal life was faith plus works.
Did not in fact Jesus say:
"This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent." -Jn. 6:29 (KJV)
Does the text say: This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent
and do good works?
Does John 3:16 read
: "For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him
and does good works should not perish, but have everlasting life."?
Did Jesus say:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me,
and does good works hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life."?
Did Jesus say:
"Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me
and does good works hath everlasting life."?
Is the message of the New Testament simply that one legal system replaced another? Are we reconciled to God by what we do or by what God did to present us holy in His sight?
Is not faith very much alive
before good works are performed, and not because of good works? Christains in the historic orthodox faith thus believe that we are saved by grace through faith and strongly agree that a faith without works is dead; that is, true saving faith will be accompanied by works. Christians also believe that faith before it has a chance to work is a saving faith also, the prime example is the thief on the cross.
If grace is a free gift (Rom. 5:15-16,18; 6:23), if it is unmerited favor - then God does not require any work in order to be justified!
The Bible clearly teaches over and over again that we are saved by faith and specifically not by our works. (Rom. 1-9; Gal. 1-3; Eph. 2; Titus 3, etc)
Yet, here again, you say you are justified to God by faith plus works.
And here again, I must repeat myself:
What James does teach is that those who say they have faith, and no works as evidence of that faith, then their faith is suspect.
If I am declared "righteous" by God by faith plus works as you espouse, and as you claim James says, then Jesus died in vain. All I need is to believe that there is a God and do good works, and I am justified in God's sight.
There is a good lesson against this sort of teaching in the gospels:
"And a certain ruler asked him, saying, Good Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life? And Jesus said unto him, Why callest thou me good? none is good, save one, that is, God. Thou knowest the commandments, Do not commit adultery, Do not kill, Do not steal, Do not bear false witness, Honour thy father and thy mother. And he said, All these have I kept from my youth up. Now when Jesus heard these things, he said unto him, Yet lackest thou one thing: sell all that thou hast, and distribute unto the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come, follow me. And when he heard this, he was very sorrowful: for he was very rich." -Lk. 18:18-23 (KJV)
Here was a person who evidently obeyed the commandments, and believed in God, but did his faith and works justify him?
Here is another one on justification:
"Two men went up into the temple to pray; the one a Pharisee, and the other a publican. The Pharisee stood and prayed thus with himself, God, I thank thee, that I am not as other men are, extortioners, unjust, adulterers, or even as this publican. I fast twice in the week, I give tithes of all that I possess. And the publican, standing afar off, would not lift up so much as his eyes unto heaven, but smote upon his breast, saying, God be merciful to me a sinner.
I tell you, this man went down to his house justified rather than the other: for every one that exalteth himself shall be abased; and he that humbleth himself shall be exalted." -Lk. 18:10-14 (KJV)
Tell me, what work did this publican do that justified him?
And did I understand you right, that you think the book of James should be thrown out of the Bible?
If it does teach that a person is justified in the sight of God based on works rather than on the imputed righteousness of Christ to us, then yes.
Rip it out of the Bible! On this point, I agree with Martin Luther!
God Bless
Till all are one.