• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What if criminal investigations were done the way creationists do science?

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,015
52,623
Guam
✟5,144,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Hence, trees would have growth rings and human bones (among others) would have calcium deposit rings.

Why? Our trees today would, but their predecessors did too? What "kinds" of trees lived back in Genesis 1?

Like I say, if you can't get past Genesis 1, you're in for a doosey of a ride, because it just gets harder from there.

Incidentally, I'm in the mood for a good challenge; so I'm going to start a thread about tree rings, etc. in the Garden just to see what happens.

You up to the challenge, Corvus?
 
Upvote 0
T

TroubleShooter43

Guest
I don't read "talk origins" (wash my mouth.) the atheistic evo fundies unholy babble. You ought to take time out to learn what evidence is rather than link me to biased opinion.

FoeHammer.

As the old saying states, "the truth hurts". There is no evidence in support of creation; everything points to evolution. Organisations such as talk origins, the panda's thumb, etc. are valuable resources in the struggle against ignorance. The only bias that one might find there is a bias in favour of the truth.
 
Upvote 0

Ryal Kane

Senior Veteran
Apr 21, 2004
3,792
461
45
Hamilton
✟21,220.00
Faith
Atheist
AV1611VET, I suspect that I asked this once before but for the life of me I can't recall your reply so..

Given embedded age as you understand it, if scientists were to examine all the natural evidence of our world, without referring to Genesis at all, would they find it, through their methods to be billions of years old? Is there any scientific test they could perform to indicate that it was younger?

If not then your position seems to be a purely philisophical one and isn't technically at odds with science.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,015
52,623
Guam
✟5,144,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Given embedded age as you understand it, if scientists were to examine all the natural evidence of our world, without referring to Genesis at all, would they find it, through their methods to be billions of years old?

Yes --- just like if you were to examine your bicycle in the parking lot.
 
Upvote 0

TheOutsider

Pope Iason Ouabache the Obscure
Dec 29, 2006
2,747
202
Indiana
✟26,428.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
How about I provide my name and address and you can pop any evidence you think you have into a very small box and mail it to me, I'll even refund the P&P? But I guess you don't have any of that kind of evidence do you? You'll want to link me to some article on the web which you consider evidence but I consider someones interpretation of alleged evidence.
That sound an awful like more hand waving. We don't give you the exact type of information that you like so you can ignore all of the other evidence there is. I still have not received an explanation from any Creationist on why naturalism, empiricism, and deductive reasoning are great science tools except when we start using them on biology and geology.

ou have seen the evidence of God you just don't see it as evidence of Him.

FoeHammer.
Congratulations on rewording exactly what I just said. I believe that a god (or several gods, honestly) exist but I have seen zero evidence that the God (YHWH, El, the God of Abraham and Moses) exists. Especially one that created the universe ~6000 years ago and caused a global flood that killed almost all life on earth ~4000 years ago.
 
Upvote 0

MoonLancer

The Moon is a reflection of the MorningStar
Aug 10, 2007
5,765
166
✟29,524.00
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
In Relationship
I haven't a clue, it's AV that brought up documentation...

what Nathan Poe is saying (correct me if i'm wrong), is that the concept of a global flood pre dates the Isrialites or at the very least the old testament.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,015
52,623
Guam
✟5,144,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,015
52,623
Guam
✟5,144,623.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican

How could Babylon have been in existence before the Flood, when Babylon was built by Nimrod, who was the son of Cush, who was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah?

People like to bring Egypt up too. How could Egypt have existed before the Flood when Egypt came from Mizraim, who came from Ham, who came from Noah?

Genesis 10 is known as the Table of Nations.
 
Upvote 0

EnemyPartyII

Well-Known Member
Sep 12, 2006
11,524
893
39
✟20,084.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
How could Babylon have been in existence before the Flood, when Babylon was built by Nimrod, who was the son of Cush, who was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah?

People like to bring Egypt up too. How could Egypt have existed before the Flood when Egypt came from Mizraim, who came from Ham, who came from Noah?

Genesis 10 is known as the Table of Nations.
how could all that happen? Ummmm... maybe because there WAS no Flood?

(otherwise, which of Noah's decendants did the Giants come from?)
 
Upvote 0
K

kidoncoathangers

Guest
How could Babylon have been in existence before the Flood, when Babylon was built by Nimrod, who was the son of Cush, who was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah?

People like to bring Egypt up too. How could Egypt have existed before the Flood when Egypt came from Mizraim, who came from Ham, who came from Noah?

Genesis 10 is known as the Table of Nations.
Any sources besides the bible that say that the said cities were build by those men, or that they were descendants of noah?
 
Upvote 0

Deadbolt

Mocker and Scoffer
Jul 19, 2007
1,019
54
40
South beloit, IL
✟23,955.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
How could Babylon have been in existence before the Flood, when Babylon was built by Nimrod, who was the son of Cush, who was the son of Ham, who was the son of Noah?

People like to bring Egypt up too. How could Egypt have existed before the Flood when Egypt came from Mizraim, who came from Ham, who came from Noah?

Genesis 10 is known as the Table of Nations.
Can you tell us then, Where the Maya and Aztecs came from? How about the Ainu? The bushmen of Australia?
 
Upvote 0