• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What Evolution needs is a series of terms, refering to how much selection pressure creates pressure

Gottservant

God loves your words, may men love them also
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2006
11,383
704
46
✟276,687.00
Faith
Messianic
Hi there,

So just simply put, I would like Evolution described in an Evolutionary way.

We've all seen pictures of unlikely transitions from one creature to the next, but none of them put the theory of Evolution to test holus bolus (all systems at one time, for one reason).

For Evolution to work, all systems have to be go on a number of fronts, simultaneously.

That simultaneity allows for a linguistic parallel of individually arbitrary but corporately necessary synchrony (that shows we respond to selection pressure, in a God-fearing way).
 

The Barbarian

Crabby Old White Guy
Apr 3, 2003
29,246
13,050
78
✟434,978.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Hi there,

So just simply put, I would like Evolution described in an Evolutionary way.

That's what evolutionary theory is. What don't you get about it?

We've all seen pictures of unlikely transitions from one creature to the next, but none of them put the theory of Evolution to test holus bolus (all systems at one time, for one reason).

Evolution is a change in allele frequency in a population over time. There are four basic points of Darwinian theory, to which genetics added random mutations to natural selection. Which of the four points, or what about genetics is a problem for you?

For Evolution to work, all systems have to be go on a number of fronts, simultaneously.

Yep. So far, that's always what we've observed.

That simultaneity allows for a linguistic parallel of individually arbitrary but corporately necessary synchrony (that shows we respond to selection pressure, in a God-fearing way).

I've always thought that if one can't say it simply, one is not clear in one's own mind what it is being discussed. Could you try to be a little more clear for us?
 
Upvote 0